Re: [Freedos-user] FAT and other file systems

2006-01-19 Thread Carl Spitzer
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 14:14 +, James Tabor wrote: > There is no way around this, unless someone will write a disclaimer, "Before > you install FreeDos, do you want to enable Fat32 Patented Features"? We are > facing the same issue with Ros. When I use FreeDos, I use the basic 8.3 > file system

Re: [Freedos-user] FAT and other file systems

2006-01-14 Thread Christian Voß
2006/1/14, Tom Lee Mullins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Christian Voß wrote:> Hi,>> I can't understand that you talk only about linux filesystems as an > alternative. There are more options like i.e. HFS, HFS+ and FFS. And> HFS /HFS+ are under GPL so we can use it without repressions.> And I think it is n

Re: [Freedos-user] FAT and other file systems

2006-01-14 Thread Tom Lee Mullins
Christian Voß wrote: Hi, I can't understand that you talk only about linux filesystems as an alternative. There are more options like i.e. HFS, HFS+ and FFS. And HFS /HFS+ are under GPL so we can use it without repressions. And I think it is not more difficult to write HFS or FFS in the kern

Re: [Freedos-user] FAT and other file systems

2006-01-13 Thread James Tabor
Hi, Christian Voß wrote: Hi, I can't understand that you talk only about linux filesystems as an alternative. There are more options like i.e. HFS, HFS+ and FFS. And HFS /HFS+ are under GPL so we can use it without repressions. And I think it is not more difficult to write HFS or FFS in the k

[Freedos-user] FAT and other file systems

2006-01-13 Thread Christian Voß
Hi,   I can't understand that you talk only about linux filesystems as an alternative. There are more options like i.e. HFS, HFS+ and FFS. And HFS /HFS+ are under GPL so we can use it without repressions. And I think it is not more difficult to write HFS or FFS in the kernel of FreeDOS than ReiserF