Hi Bernd,
guess why we call ATAPICDD.SYS alpha..
UDMA drivers seem to stabilize the ATAPICDD driver (or IDE bus) a bit.
I didn't mean to imply we expect it to work perfectly at alpha stage. I
was just saying there are some definite problems. It's not just me, I
think the FreeDOS FDConfig.
> My first problem was in the installation process. When I tried to see
> the content of one package, right now I don't remember well the name,
> it happened an error and a message error was printed on the screen in
> text mode.
I think I've had a report of this. This is most likely the graphic
can show
> > you the exactly error message). This problem always was happening when
> > FreeDOS could not read a unit disk. I think is a problem of
> > translation in the command.com.
>
> This is new. Check if replacing command.com with the devel one from
> fdos.org/kernel works.
If it doesn't wo
Hi Blair,
My first problem was in the installation process. When I tried to see
the content of one package, right now I don't remember well the name,
it happened an error and a message error was printed on the screen in
text mode.
After installation process (one of the applications to install ga
> they use boot disks. FreeDOS is easy in that sense. But I tried to
> install the FreeDOS 0.9 Beta Enhaced Disk and it gave me some
> problems. Also the Atapi cd-rom driver included (the alpha version) is
> very slow to load! Do you recommend me to install better the FreeDOS
> 0.9 Lite Version or
Gerry Hickman schreef:
There are some definite problems with the CD driver, you may want to
try VIDE-CDD.SYS
guess why we call ATAPICDD.SYS alpha..
In fact I don't know the state of any revision of it (binary is 0.2.10 I
think) and if it's simply a case of
"NASM ATAPICDD.NSM" or not for any ne
Hi Chema,
I haven't could to take a look at 32 bits and preemptive multitask DOS
versions, because they are very expensive:
> Another subject, what about DOS GUI? Seal is dead, also BreadBox
> Ensemble GEOS, so nowadays there isn't any project to develop a modern
> GUI for DOS. Windows 3.xx is
Thank you very much for your quick answers and your help.
I'm a really fan of DOS systems. For me is the best system (at least
the last system that I know what really is doing on the startup and
then I can configure it). From Windows 95 onwards all is a black
box...
I have the following DOS syste
