Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 1:49 AM, dmccunney wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
>>
>> http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk
>
> TestDisk is wonderful, but it's a partition recovery program. It uses
> low-level disk reads to find partition data, and doesn't care what th
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:53 PM, bruce.bowman tds.net
> wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone tried NTFS4DOS? I had it on a boot CD once that I occasionally
>> used for data recovery, but in that context it was all menu-driven and
>> seemed to function a lot l
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:53 PM, bruce.bowman tds.net
wrote:
>
> Has anyone tried NTFS4DOS? I had it on a boot CD once that I occasionally
> used for data recovery, but in that context it was all menu-driven and
> seemed to function a lot like 4DOS (anyone remember that? a poor man's
> Windo
Has anyone tried NTFS4DOS? I had it on a boot CD once that I occasionally
used for data recovery, but in that context it was all menu-driven and
seemed to function a lot like 4DOS (anyone remember that? a poor man's
Windows Explorer). I don't know what its capabilities would be on the
command line
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:47 AM, kurt godel wrote:
> Bruce, et al,
> I have reinstalled XP hundreds of times, and I always preformat the XP's
> partition(usually c)
> with fat32; this forces the XP install to give the option to install XP on
> fat32, which I always choose.
> it may be that som
Bruce, et al,
I have reinstalled XP hundreds of times, and I always preformat the XP's
partition(usually c)
with fat32; this forces the XP install to give the option to install XP on
fat32, which I always choose.
it may be that some windows apps *must* run in ntfs, but I've never used
one.
As
