> What have I ever said
> in the ReactOS community that calls for threatening me with prosecution?
> If nothing merits this, there is proof then that the ReactOS community
> is troubled and possibly that this trouble is as serious as I suggest.
Judge not, that ye be not judged.
IOW: don't spam t
>> What stopped the plans?
>
> Only Japheth knows ...
I guess you're refering to this:
http://www.bttr-software.de/forum/forum_entry.php?id=4486
Nothing stopped the plans, but it's delayed a bit ... and I happened to
implement 2. before 1. Are yu going to complain about this?
JWlink is now in
> Just a note to let you know that repeated use of VIM 7.3.46 (DOS32
> binary) will crash JEMMEX 5.74b if it is used. M$'s HIMEM and EMM386
> works perfectly with it.
I tried and I have no problems with VIM - that is, I DO have problems, but
they are not related to crashes, but to the funny user
> [snip] I think
> everybody has learned the last years that GPL software can be used
> without any second thoughts and distributed freely.[snip]
No.
> I am also a real fan of the Free Software idea. Otherwise I wouldn't
> use FreeDOS (which is released under the GPL as well). Some developers
> m
> 1). NOEMS is rarely used, and a lot of things don't handle it well.
...
> ... I wouldn't do this. Just load a XMS
> driver only (and not via "NOEMS").
NOEMS is ok and safe, the switch which causes problems with some programs is
FRAME=NONE.
> 2). Actually, I've noticed JEMM386 will hang if you
> I can’t get jemmex.exe to supply any upper memory. It seems to think that it
> is supplying it.
Yes. And if is "thinking" that it does then it does, because it has full
control over the paging tables.
> UMB supplied at a01f-b7ff, free.
The UMBs are there, but DOS has ignored them. You should
> actually I have absolutely no idea where I should even start to
> search for a computer without x87 ;)
This isn't a problem, because the CR0 register always has the EM bit which
allows to emulate a cpu without fpu. :))
I wrote a FPU emulator for the 386 cpu a few years ago. I didn't notice any
> I don't really use DOS any more, so I'm afraid I am unlikely to use
> your tool; I am just trying to clarify what you are being asked for,
> as you seem not to be getting it.
He's getting it pretty good IMO.
Additionally, there is this info:
> Reading the file LANSTAT.TXT, which is included i
> Yes, VirtualBox graphic card indeed is VESA compliant. The whole problem is
> about Windows 3.11 not supporting VESA :)
> If there was somewhere a Win 3.11 graphic driver designed to work with VESA
> cards, that would definitely solve my issue... Unfortunately, so far, I
> haven't found any, a
> In my previous UIDE comments the word "P-R-E-S-E-N-T"
> was truncated by whatever forum software is in use to
> the word "S-E-N-T"!!
No problem here. There are 3 occurances of "sent" in your first post, and all
threee have a nice "pre" prefix.
--
>> I see no reason why there couldn't be a 1.1 release followed by a 1.2
>> release up to a 1.9 release.
>
> There is one very good reason: we don't have up-to-date packages...
> To release a v1.1, we'd need to have a complete liste of all latest FreeDOS
> packages.
> See http://www.ibiblio.org/p
11 matches
Mail list logo
