It would likely be prudent to get a confirmation statement from Russell
Nelson as well.
Per crynwr.com
nel...@crynwr.com
+1 315 323 1241 voice
Crynwr Software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd.
Potsdam, NY 13676
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:19 AM John Vella wrote:
> Agree!
>
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, 07:33 Th
On 10/14/2021 4:06 AM, Jon Brase wrote:
Oct 13, 2021 23:39:17 Jim Hall
It appears that somewhere along the line, someone (at AMD?) had access
to the sources, probably in a larger source tree, and ran a batch job
or script to apply the "AMD" statement to a bunch of source files. And
that happen
> Hi Jim and Everyone,
>
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:58 AM Jim Hall wrote:
> [..]
>
> *If you agree or disagree, I'd appreciate your reply to this email.
> Agreement can be simply "agree" or "+1". If you disagree, please
> discuss. (But consensus from the last discussion favored including
> FDNET,
Hi Jim and Everyone,
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:58 AM Jim Hall wrote:
> [..]
> *If you agree or disagree, I'd appreciate your reply to this email.
> Agreement can be simply "agree" or "+1". If you disagree, please
> discuss. (But consensus from the last discussion favored including
> FDNET, so i
Oct 13, 2021 23:39:17 Jim Hall
>
>
> It appears that somewhere along the line, someone (at AMD?) had access
> to the sources, probably in a larger source tree, and ran a batch job
> or script to apply the "AMD" statement to a bunch of source files. And
> that happened to catch these GPL and publi
Agree!
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, 07:33 Thomas Mueller, wrote:
> from Jim Hall:
>
>
> > I don't know why the sources later had an "AMD" statement put on them,
> > but you cannot claim "proprietary" or "copyright" on something that
> > was previously released under the GNU General Public License.
>
> >
