Thomas: In DOS, only one program at a time can control the mouse. It will
either be MOUSKEYS or it will be the other program, but it can't be both at the
same time. If a program already interfaces with the mouse, it is usually
better to let the program control the mouse since it can change wha
Hi,
(wow, sorry, I'm horribly late in replying)
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:27 PM Tomas By wrote:
>
> Am trying to use Latex (from DJGPP) in Freedos, and get errors
> seemingly having to do with long file names.
My memory isn't flawless, so corrections welcome, but
Most DJGPP .ZIPs halfway
Hi Liam,
> I personally prefer running PC DOS 7.1 or DR-DOS. The small differences
> in FreeDOS irritate me, and I am more familiar with these versions.
Please mention a few examples of differences :-)
> I was an expert in DOS manual memory management and could usually get
> circa 620 kB free
Hello Ralf,
On a slightly related note: https://www.pcjs.org/blog/2018/05/27/ . :-)
Well, that article has a whole lot of nothing about "CALL 5".
Read on carefully. :-) There is a VM of PC-DOS 2.0 which includes a
utility that was part of Microsoft Word ... and the utility uses `call 5'.
(A
On 4/17/2021 10:23 AM, TK Chia wrote:
Hello Ralf,
The "CALL 5" equivalent was never properly implemented, I guess Peterson
ran into problems with the differences of the 8080 and 8086 CPUs.
[...]
And you will have a hard time to find any serious documentation on that
CALL 5 stuff for any ver
Hello Ralf,
The "CALL 5" equivalent was never properly implemented, I guess Peterson
ran into problems with the differences of the 8080 and 8086 CPUs.
[...]
And you will have a hard time to find any serious documentation on that
CALL 5 stuff for any version of DOS. And I would be surprised i
On 4/17/2021 3:39 AM, TK Chia wrote:
Hello Liam, hello Tom,
And according to the mainstream account (?), CP/M-86 would not be
released until late 1981. QDOS was released earlier, in mid-1980
(https://archive.org/stream/byte-magazine-1980-08/1980_08_BYTE_05-08_The_Forth_Language#page/n173/mode/
yes something of fdapm goin the startup . in the autoexec.bat but by default in rem lineciaoenvoyé : 16 avril 2021 à 13:15de : Thomas Desi à : "Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS." objet : Re: [Freedos-user] Why do you use DOSMateusz, this _one_= 66297 2009-09-11 18:42:08 fdapm-2009se
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 13:36, tom ehlert wrote:
>
> and by extension FreeDOS is an unlicensed copy of MSDOS 6.x ?
>
> nope.
And now you are talking to yourself – and disagreeing with yourself?!
Are you feeling all right?
--
Liam Proven – Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 11:21, tom ehlert wrote:
> by TK Chia's remark, CP/M-86 didn't even exist yet when he wrote QDOS.
> and QDOS couldn't compete with CP/M as CP/M doesn't run on 8088.
Did the original Mac compete with the PC? The PC can't run MacOS. The
Mac couldn't run DOS (without expensiv
Hallo Herr tom ehlert,
am Samstag, 17. April 2021 um 11:20 schrieben Sie:
> BTW: your original statement was
> 'Remember that in effect MS-DOS was an unlicensed copy of Digital
>Research's CP/M and particularly CP/M-86.'
> by TK Chia's remark, CP/M-86 didn't even exist yet when he wrote Q
Hello Bret,
allow me to ask you, the author of »mouskeys« and am I right the »usbutils"
(usb drivers for dos) two questions?
1) Some DOS Programs (text editors) seem to »override« the mouskeys settings
(what is summarized in "mouskeys /t«). Is there a trick to obey to mouskeys.com?
- I am no
Hello Liam, hello Tom,
And according to the mainstream account (?), CP/M-86 would not be
released until late 1981. QDOS was released earlier, in mid-1980
(https://archive.org/stream/byte-magazine-1980-08/1980_08_BYTE_05-08_The_Forth_Language#page/n173/mode/2up).
QDOS's system call interface
BTW: your original statement was
'Remember that in effect MS-DOS was an unlicensed copy of Digital
Research's CP/M and particularly CP/M-86.'
by TK Chia's remark, CP/M-86 didn't even exist yet when he wrote QDOS.
and QDOS couldn't compete with CP/M as CP/M doesn't run on 8088.
> I still mai
Hello Liam,
All right, I have to concede that point.
Thank you --- glad we could agree. :-)
I still maintain there is a bit of a difference between copying a
rival's API in order to launch a competing product, and copying a
rival's API in order to do something completely different with it.
15 matches
Mail list logo