Hi there,
Interesting question.
Is there a reason why, if you intend running windows 3.11, that you do not
want to use the MS dos closely associated with that windows at the time?
5.0 6.0, or 6.22?
My guess about ms dos 7.1 is that it draws from a much later
infrastructure.
I run that edition
Hey!
Windows for Workgroups always runs in 386enhanced mode,
unless you run it in what Win95/Win98 called safe mode
and which has limited features.
This mode is VERY picky about interactions with DOS, as
it moves the running DOS into a virtual task and even
is able to clone it when you open mul
A simple google search gives you an answer.
Search for windows 3.1 freedos in Google.
Presto:
http://wiki.freedos.org/wiki/index.php/Windows
On 2-11-20 00:28, TheBigBlue Guard wrote:
Hello FreeDOSers,
How was your Halloween ? Mine was okay... No tricks yet !
My Q and Problem :
I understan
Hello FreeDOSers,
How was your Halloween ? Mine was okay... No tricks yet !
My Q and Problem :
I understand you need a DOS oper sys underlying Win For Workgroups 3.1.1 OS
in a mult-boot native environment (no boxes / no emulators).Which DOS
OS do you strongly recommend ? and why ? I have MS
