It would seem that is the logical solution.
I thank you all for the advice. I have compared a few editors and have
decided to start with Setedit.
I am updating a bible translation (The Concordant Literal Translation)
which I originally compiled for my BibleWorks program using UltraEdit in
Linux.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:19 PM, dmccunney wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe that was because DOS is not really made for large RAM.
>>
>> Editors I'm aware of that ran under DOS and edited really lar
I thank you all for the advice. I have compared a few editors and have
decided to start with Setedit.
I am updating a bible translation (The Concordant Literal Translation)
which I originally compiled for my BibleWorks program using UltraEdit in
Linux. The Old Testament text recently received a l
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:19 PM, dmccunney wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>
>> Maybe that was because DOS is not really made for large RAM.
>
> Editors I'm aware of that ran under DOS and edited really large files
> used spill files, keeping what would fit i
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
> Using elvis 2.2, I was able to view and edit files in DR-DOS above 1.5 MB, but
> scrolling through a file of 3 MB was prohibitively slow; no such problem in
> Linux.
I had bad memories of Elvis. Not that it was bad in features, but
