Re: [Freedos-user] UPX or not UPX FreeDOS programs/TSRs?

2014-05-04 Thread Bret Johnson
At least for the programs I write (mostly TSR's), there is additional functionality provided if the executable is not compressed. Specifically, if you TYPE the executable program file (e.g., "TYPE FileName.com"), you will see some usable information displayed on the screen. For TSR's, this is

Re: [Freedos-user] Load file sys driver in dconfig.sys?

2014-05-04 Thread Ray Davison
Ray Davison wrote: > Is it possible to load an exe file system driver in dconfig.sys? > > I have a DOS HPFS driver that works OK, but I would like it to get a > drive letter before the DVDs. > > What is available for reading NTFS used in WXP, W7? Let me explain the actual task. I have FreeDOS and

Re: [Freedos-user] Load file sys driver in dconfig.sys?

2014-05-04 Thread dmccunney
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Rugxulo wrote: > On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Ray Davison wrote: > >> What is available for reading NTFS used in WXP, W7? NTFS was actually introduced in Win NT Workstation, and released to consumers in Win2K, though I recall installing to FAT32 as a 2K option.

Re: [Freedos-user] Load file sys driver in dconfig.sys?

2014-05-04 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Ray Davison wrote: > > Is it possible to load an exe file system driver in dconfig.sys? Did you mean FDCONFIG.SYS? (IIRC, dconfig.sys is from DR-DOS.) > I have a DOS HPFS driver that works OK, but I would like it to get a > drive letter before the DVDs. I do

Re: [Freedos-user] UPX or not UPX FreeDOS programs/TSRs?

2014-05-04 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: > > Thus, what is Your opinion on the use of UPX? I think it's good and works well. Sure, if you don't have any local restrictions (bandwidth limits, mail attachment limits, slow upload time, limited disk size, or similar), it may not

Re: [Freedos-user] display command

2014-05-04 Thread dmccunney
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Dale E Sterner wrote: > My machines are all old and use only IDE. As for SATA I don't see how > that could be better. > The S stands for serial or one bit at a time. A SATA drive interface has > only 4 lines going > into it vs IDE which has 44 lines. On SATA 2 line

Re: [Freedos-user] Load file sys driver in dconfig.sys?

2014-05-04 Thread mcelhanon
There is this DOS utility created in the mid 1990s called "spawn" by Geoff Chappell in Australia. I do not know if it will work with FreeDOS, I've only used it with MS DOS. It allows DOS program execution (exe file) from config.sys during boot. It will not run a resident program from conventional m

Re: [Freedos-user] Load file sys driver in dconfig.sys?

2014-05-04 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Matej Horvat schreef op 4-5-2014 17:53: > No, the Mac OS file systems are HFS and HFS+ (and MFS if you're vintage). > HPFS is the OS/2 file system. Oops, I stand corrected. Thanks! Also for eComStation then I suppose, or whatever the name nowadays is. Bernd

Re: [Freedos-user] Load file sys driver in dconfig.sys?

2014-05-04 Thread Matej Horvat
On Sun, 04 May 2014 17:40:54 +0200, Bernd Blaauw wrote: > Dale E Sterner schreef op 4-5-2014 17:33: >> What does an HPFS driver do? > > Access to the Apple Macintosh / MacOS / OSX operating system's > filesystem, just as NTFS is associated with Microsoft Windows No, the Mac OS file systems are H

Re: [Freedos-user] display command

2014-05-04 Thread Frantisek Hanzlik
Dale E Sterner wrote: > My machines are all old and use only IDE. As for SATA I don't see how > that could be better. > The S stands for serial or one bit at a time. A SATA drive interface has > only 4 lines going > into it vs IDE which has 44 lines. On SATA 2 lines are for power, the > other 2 lin

Re: [Freedos-user] UPX or not UPX FreeDOS programs/TSRs?

2014-05-04 Thread Michael B. Brutman
Hello, It depends. Here is some data to consider: For mTCP I distribute 11 executables in two different forms - UPX compressed and standard. The UPX versions sum to 496KB. The original versions sum to 824KB. The UPX versions require 60% of the space of the originals. On a low-end 8088 cl

Re: [Freedos-user] display command

2014-05-04 Thread Michael B. Brutman
Synchronizing the sending of bits over parallel interfaces is much more difficult than it is to send a single serial bit stream. As a result, you can send that single serial stream of bits faster than you can do it in parallel across multiple wires. SCSI went through this transition when driv

Re: [Freedos-user] Load file sys driver in dconfig.sys?

2014-05-04 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Dale E Sterner schreef op 4-5-2014 17:33: > What does an HPFS driver do? Access to the Apple Macintosh / MacOS / OSX operating system's filesystem, just as NTFS is associated with Microsoft Windows > > cheers > DS > > > On Sat, 03 May 2014 16:29:32 -0700 Ray Davison > writes: >> Is it possible

Re: [Freedos-user] Load file sys driver in dconfig.sys?

2014-05-04 Thread Dale E Sterner
What does an HPFS driver do? cheers DS On Sat, 03 May 2014 16:29:32 -0700 Ray Davison writes: > Is it possible to load an exe file system driver in dconfig.sys? > > I have a DOS HPFS driver that works OK, but I would like it to get a > > drive letter before the DVDs. > > What is available f

Re: [Freedos-user] display command

2014-05-04 Thread Dale E Sterner
My machines are all old and use only IDE. As for SATA I don't see how that could be better. The S stands for serial or one bit at a time. A SATA drive interface has only 4 lines going into it vs IDE which has 44 lines. On SATA 2 lines are for power, the other 2 lines are for data. Using the same cl

Re: [Freedos-user] Load file sys driver in dconfig.sys?

2014-05-04 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Ray Davison schreef op 4-5-2014 01:29: > Is it possible to load an exe file system driver in dconfig.sys? > > I have a DOS HPFS driver that works OK, but I would like it to get a > drive letter before the DVDs. I don't see why you'd have to load your EXE-driver in CONFIG.SYS then, considering the

Re: [Freedos-user] UPX or not UPX FreeDOS programs/TSRs?

2014-05-04 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Frantisek Hanzlik schreef op 4-5-2014 11:17: > Hi all more experienced, > > I'm trying to revise and update dosemu-freedos package (subset of > FreeDOS stuff used in DOSEMU usual installation) and I'm not sure, > what is better - whether packaged programs by UPX or not. Actual > dosemu-freedos-1.0-

[Freedos-user] UPX or not UPX FreeDOS programs/TSRs?

2014-05-04 Thread Frantisek Hanzlik
Hi all more experienced, I'm trying to revise and update dosemu-freedos package (subset of FreeDOS stuff used in DOSEMU usual installation) and I'm not sure, what is better - whether packaged programs by UPX or not. Actual dosemu-freedos-1.0-bin.tgz contains 40+ binaries, roughly half of them is p