Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-15 Thread dmccunney
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:24 PM, dos386 wrote: >> I do have the Adobe Flash player installed, but it's not involved in >> the transaction. The attachments in question are not SWF objects. > > But Google maybe translates them into SWF ... does the attach No, it doesn't. > viewer still work when

Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-15 Thread dos386
> I do have the Adobe Flash player installed, but it's not involved in > the transaction. The attachments in question are not SWF objects. But Google maybe translates them into SWF ... does the attach viewer still work when you disable or remove Adobe Flash ? > There is an assortment of web con

Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-15 Thread dmccunney
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:52 PM, dos386 wrote: >> Email is the principal vector for _v_i_r_u_s_ delivery, but attachments all >> reside on Google's servers too, and never reach my machine. > > Funny ... True. You can't deliver a virus by a nasty attachment if the attachment never reaches the use

Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-15 Thread dos386
> Email is the principal vector for _v_i_r_u_s_ delivery, by attachments all > reside on Google's servers too, and never reach my machine. Funny ... > Google has viewers for all common file types Really? How does it work? How do you see the file on Gooogle's server? Maybe you have the ADOBE FLU