On 2013-04-22 02:07 (GMT+0200) Aleve Sicofante composed:
> I created two PRIMARY partitions: a 39GB one and a 1GB one. I marked the
> second partition as Active. I did all this using the tools provided in the
> FreeDOS CD. After partitioning and rebooting, I proceeded with the
> installation of Fr
On 2013-04-22 02:07 (GMT+0200) Aleve Sicofante composed:
> ...2.5" drive enclosure from Zalman, the VE-300...
Is there any USB3 support in FreeDOS???
All my external backup cases except my oldest one include eSATA support.
eSATA is mostly all I ever use for external HDs. They're DOS bootable ex
2013/4/21 Kenneth J. Davis
> There are two different issues here.
> 1) The hard drive's master boot record (MBR - 1st sector where the
> partition table resides) must have bootable code installed. If you later
> intend to boot an OS from the 1st partition then installing a boot manager
> is a go
here how I making freedos iso...
dd if=/dev/zero of=freedos.img bs=1024 count=34000
mkdosfs -F 32 freedos.img
/usr/src/sys-freedos.pl --disk=freedos.img
mount -o loop fdboot.img /mnt/dos2/
mount -o loop freedos.img /mnt/dos/
cp -a /mnt/dos2/* /mnt/dos/
mkisofs -udf -b isolinux/isolin
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Aleve Sicofante wrote:
>
>
> 2013/4/21 Felix Miata
>
>> On 2013-04-21 18:19 (GMT+0200) Aleve Sicofante composed:
>>
>> > Felix Miata composed:
>>
>> >> Because the first isn't a bootable OS anyway, I would definitely
>> choose #1,
>> >> the simplest. If the OS tha
On 2013-04-21 19:32 (GMT+0200) Aleve Sicofante composed:
> Felix Miata composed:
>> On 2013-04-21 18:19 (GMT+0200) Aleve Sicofante composed:
>> > Felix Miata composed:
>> >> Because the first isn't a bootable OS anyway, I would definitely choose
>> >> #1,
>> >> the simplest. If the OS that nee
2013/4/21 Felix Miata
> On 2013-04-21 18:19 (GMT+0200) Aleve Sicofante composed:
>
> > Felix Miata composed:
>
> >> Because the first isn't a bootable OS anyway, I would definitely choose
> #1,
> >> the simplest. If the OS that needs access to the first is old and
> >> unsophisticated, another so
On 2013-04-21 18:19 (GMT+0200) Aleve Sicofante composed:
> Felix Miata composed:
>> Because the first isn't a bootable OS anyway, I would definitely choose #1,
>> the simplest. If the OS that needs access to the first is old and
>> unsophisticated, another solution might be needed for it to maint
2013/4/21 Felix Miata
>
> On 2013-04-21 17:48 (GMT+0200) Aleve Sicofante composed:
>
> > Thanks Felix, so it doesn't matter which choice I select in the last
> > installation step? I'm referring to the last step you can see on this
> > picture:
> > http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/freedos/nfs
On 2013-04-21 17:48 (GMT+0200) Aleve Sicofante composed:
> Thanks Felix, so it doesn't matter which choice I select in the last
> installation step? I'm referring to the last step you can see on this
> picture:
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/freedos/nfs/project/f/fr/freedos/5/5b/Installhd
2013/4/21 Felix Miata
> On 2013-04-21 15:48 (GMT+0200) Aleve Sicofante composed:
>
> > I have a single 40GB disk and I need its first partition for other
> > purposes, so I want to install FreeDOS on the second partition of the
> > disk (that's the last 1GB of the disk, BTW). The process seems to
On 2013-04-21 15:48 (GMT+0200) Aleve Sicofante composed:
> I have a single 40GB disk and I need its first partition for other
> purposes, so I want to install FreeDOS on the second partition of the
> disk (that's the last 1GB of the disk, BTW). The process seems to be
> the same as if chose the fi
I have a single 40GB disk and I need its first partition for other
purposes, so I want to install FreeDOS on the second partition of the
disk (that's the last 1GB of the disk, BTW). The process seems to be
the same as if chose the first partition, but when I'm finished,
FreeDOS won't boot. It will
13 matches
Mail list logo
