Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros
wrote:
>
>> Hence I suggest sticking with 7ZA920.ZIP or some version of
>> p7zip 9.20.1 (despite bugs), at least under DOS.
>
> I downloaded this version:
>
> /pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/file/7zip/9.20.1/testing/p7z9
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros
wrote:
>
>> That's what I thought might be the case. Your source files are
>> basically 7 bit ASCII.
>
>> I'd call your use case something to be handled by a Revision
>> Control System. We normally think of them as used for progr
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros
wrote:
>
>> Some (e.g. JED, which I need to package up for FreeDOS one of
>> these days) also seem to have their own LaTeX modes too (not
>> that I've tried!), if you're willing to switch editors
>> temporarily. (TDE is great b
Hi Rugxulo,
> Some (e.g. JED, which I need to package up for FreeDOS one of
> these days) also seem to have their own LaTeX modes too (not
> that I've tried!), if you're willing to switch editors
> temporarily. (TDE is great but doesn't have lots of frills or
> extensibility.)
By "LaTeX modes" do
Hi,
On Mar 23, 2013 4:37 PM, "Marcos Favero Florence de Barros" <
fav...@mpcnet.com.br> wrote:
>
> > That's what I thought might be the case. Your source files are
> > basically 7 bit ASCII.
>
> > I'd call your use case something to be handled by a Revision
> > Control System. We normally think
Hi Rugxulo,
> Hence I suggest sticking with 7ZA920.ZIP or some version of
> p7zip 9.20.1 (despite bugs), at least under DOS.
I downloaded this version:
/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/file/7zip/9.20.1/testing/p7z9201-latest.zip
2012-Sep-03 13:00:32
... and here's a couple of observations
Hi Dennis,
> That's what I thought might be the case. Your source files are
> basically 7 bit ASCII.
> I'd call your use case something to be handled by a Revision
> Control System. We normally think of them as used for program
> code, but they can be used for manuscripts as well. Take a look
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:32 PM, john s wolter
wrote:
>
>> It's never going to be full speed nor perfect emulation.
>
> I'm aware an application running on FreeDOS inside of VirtualBox has to be
> much slower. That said, understand the future of most legacy operating
> systems that ran on ol
Rugxulo,
It's never going to be full speed nor perfect emulation. It's too
> tricky to emulate everything (esp. pmode). Anything to do with
> segmentation is probably lower priority (due to complexity and
> deprecation) than the bare minimum (686-ish pmode) that *nix and
> Windows require.
>
I'm
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:11 AM, john s wolter
wrote:
>
> I've been using VirtualBox in Windows 7 on a Sony Vaio Duo Core /w 4
> gigabytes of RAM. VirtualBox's load times are okay but the execution of
> MS-DOS & a particular character-display application program is usable very
> but slow.
I
I've been using VirtualBox in Windows 7 on a Sony Vaio Duo Core /w 4
gigabytes of RAM. VirtualBox's load times are okay but the execution of
MS-DOS & a particular character-display application program is usable very
but slow.
Understanding this issue is best approached by examining VirtualBox and
The UIDE bug in VirtualBox that took ~2 minutes to load
has been fixed now...
Am now running FreeDOS easily,
so others can do the same,
and VirtualBox is free!
Yay!
eufdp...@yahoo.com
eufdp...@yahoo.com
eufdp...@yahoo.com
eufdp...@yahoo.com
eufdp...@y
12 matches
Mail list logo
