I have a dos driver for the Sound Blaster 16 PCI card, but not a Windows
3.1 driver. The patch for the SVGA256 driver to make it VESA compliant
worked beautifully, thanks for the tip.
I've been trying to play LodeRunner where it crashes on the bomb scene.
Why does Jemmex give an error when I exi
Hey,
I was wondering how you get the drivers for the other cards in a comp
that used to run something else, but now runs FreeDOS. For example: how do
you find the sound card manufacturer to get a driver? Or for any other
drivers? Is there an easy program like NICSCAN (
http://www.georgpotthast.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:23 PM, escape wrote:
> On 11.04.12 22:23, dmccunney wrote:
>> Current machines won't *boot* DOS, but will *run* it in a
>> compatibility box, emulator or virtual machine.
>
> I'm think you're making a bit misleading statement. While there *are*
> current machines that w
On 11.04.12 22:23, dmccunney wrote:
> Current machines won't *boot* DOS, but will *run* it in a
> compatibility box, emulator or virtual machine.
I'm think you're making a bit misleading statement. While there *are*
current machines that won't boot DOS, 99% of the *current* machines can
boot it.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Tom Ehlert wrote:
>
> 11. April 2012 um 21:23, dmccunney wrote
>
>> Current machines won't *boot* DOS, but will *run* it in a
>> compatibility box, emulator or virtual machine.
>
> I wonder what you are talking about.
>
> current machines *do* boot DOS, and mosty
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Marco Achury wrote:
> At this point the options are to use emulators or to port DOS to new
> processors (new x86 based or totally different processor family as ARM)
>
> For example www.raspberrypi.org is working on a very interesting low priced
> ARM computer.
> A
Hello,
> For example www.raspberrypi.org is working on a very interesting low
> priced ARM computer.
> As our FreeDOS kernel is based mainly on C code, at least in the
> theory, is possible adapt it to compile it on a diferent very
> processor-architechture.
I thought the kernel was written in a
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Michael B. Brutman
wrote:
> On 4/11/2012 9:17 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> I don't understand the "changing OSes and compilers due to arbitrary
> limitations comment". Are you saying that people are being forced to
> move away from OW because there is no 64 bit su
On 04/12/2012 06:54 AM, dmccunney wrote:
> ...
> the question becomes "Why do you *need* to do this?"
>
> The answer is that generally, you *don't*. Current hardware is
> increasingly faster and more powerful. In the old days you talked
> directly to the hardware to squeeze the maximum performanc
11. April 2012 um 21:23, dmccunney wrote
> Current machines won't *boot* DOS, but will *run* it in a
> compatibility box, emulator or virtual machine.
I wonder what you are talking about.
current machines *do* boot DOS, and mosty likely will continue to do
so for the foreseeable future.
> If
10 matches
Mail list logo
