2012/3/13, Ralf A. Quint :
> So far, this rather looks like a problem with 4DOS, not with JEMM as
> I initially suspected... :?
Under FreeDOS problems were with JEMM or 4DOS - either of both was
enough to cause mentioned slow-down (or both together, of course).
--
regards,
Zbigniew
At 12:35 PM 3/13/2012, Zbigniew wrote:
>After Eric's suggestion I made additional tests: still on original
>MS-DOS 6.22; I used JEMMEX this time:
>
>1. JEMMEX + 4DOS means problem, but...
>2. ...JEMMEX + command.com didn't make any problem! Neither to the
>game, nor to DX-Forth.
>
>I'm always using
After Eric's suggestion I made additional tests: still on original
MS-DOS 6.22; I used JEMMEX this time:
1. JEMMEX + 4DOS means problem, but...
2. ...JEMMEX + command.com didn't make any problem! Neither to the
game, nor to DX-Forth.
I'm always using "X=TEST I=TEST" parameters.
The test under Fr
2012/3/11, Bernd Blaauw :
> Please let us know if/when you're able to pinpoint a culprit.
> You might want to start with a MSDOS/Win9x bootdisk (www.bootdisk.com)
> to eliminate FreeDOS components as the culprit, and to have a proven
> reference platform.
Just finished first tests: under original
