At 08:54 PM 2/17/2012, kurt godel wrote:
>but I fear to do it since I've been using the int by way of the
>UNION regs gambit, whereas you are showing a direct asm patch. I am
>afraid I will screw up the regs structure.
What is there much to mess up, it's just a "pseudo" structure to a
more C li
Thank you Tom.
Actually, I also used the 'hidemouse' subfunction; I didn't know it would
*terminate* the mouse function. I am surprised to learn of the
multiple-calls-to-it aspect. The idea of setting cx=0 is interesting,
but I fear to do it since I've been using the int by way of the UNION regs
g
