Hi,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:12 PM, dmccunney wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>
> From my point of view, the main factor is
> that it grabs 16MB of RAM, and I haven't a lot to begin with.
16 MB isn't much by today's standards. And 256 MB *should* be plenty
for web brow
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
> Hi,
> (third edit, I really ramble too much)
You aren't alone.
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:36 AM, dmccunney wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
>>>
>>> VirtualBox would be easier, but your cpu may not support VT-X, sadly
Hi,
(third edit, I really ramble too much)
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:36 AM, dmccunney wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:40 PM, dmccunney wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>>>
>>> I've had worse pains. I normall
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Garry Ricketson
wrote:
> Dennis,
> When I installed FreeDos, to a new partition, for it, all I did was after
> it was installed,
> at the Linux command line I typed:
> sudo update-grub
> And FreeDos was added to the boot list,..boots fine I see you have also
> t
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Rugxulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:40 PM, dmccunney wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
>>
>> I've had worse pains. I normally prefer to have each OS on its own
>> drive, but that wasn't an option here.
>
> VirtualBox would
