-- Forwarded message --
From: kurt godel
Date: Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:54 AM
Subject: Update on dos extenders viz djgpp.
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Have just tried WDOSX, which is now royalty free, even for commercial
applications; this refers to exe's 'extended'
by wdo
Ok, this time, really clear: the download of wdosx is free for personal use;
any file you process with it, is also
royalty free, even for commercial use; I believe the distribution of wdos
itself would still require a volume license.
--kurt.
-
Have just tried WDOSX, which is now royalty free, even for commercial
applications; this refers to exe's 'extended'
by wdos. The wdos actually prepends a stub to the exe,as well as an extender
exe, so that the result is standalone
with no outside files. As stated, any exe that you extend in this wa
> Does anyone know if theres an opposite of subst? (i.e. link a drive to a
> directory) similar to an NTFS Junction Point?
>
> I'm wondering both if there is a driver or maybe a user-land utility
> that can be
> ran to produce such functionality on FAT12/16/32 file systems either for
> use on
Christian, don't get me wrong, I very much appreciate yours (and those
of many people) when it gets technical. I just don't know if plain
FreeDOS users end up getting a simple question when they are looking
for it.
Anyway, not many people answered, so perhaps my appreciation is wrong
and everything
Hey There!
Does anyone know if theres an opposite of subst? (i.e. link a drive to a
directory) similar to an NTFS Junction Point?
I'm wondering both if there is a driver or maybe a user-land utility that can be
ran to produce such functionality on FAT12/16/32 file systems either for use on
FreeD
Thanks for finding that. The link to the Slax version was broken. It
should work now.
-maybeway36
2009/7/1 Aitor Santamaría :
> Hello!!
>
> Apparently, the "downloads" link is broken, right?
> I thought you would want to know about it..
>
> Aitor
>
> 2009/4/28 maybeway36 :
>> My newest project is
>>> Users apparently don't want
>>> technical details on the Freedos-user list however.
>
>> I don't think so: some want, some do not. The question is that
>> currently there's no way to know about it. So I am almost decided to
>> create that freedos-basic list, so that technical details can run he
Hi Aitor,
>> Users apparently don't want
>> technical details on the Freedos-user list however.
> I don't think so: some want, some do not. The question is that
> currently there's no way to know about it. So I am almost decided to
> create that freedos-basic list, so that technical details can
