Michael Robinson schreef:
> Speaking of abandonware, all the Nintendo games for the original
> 8 bit system fit that description now. Should anyone distribute
>
what is the definition of abandonware anyway? and why would it be legal
if it did fit the description? to my knowledge Nintendo is u
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 22:59 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
> > Downloading commercial software that you own a copy of for personal
> > use is not illegal. Downloading old commercial software that isn't
> > sold anymore which the author doesn't care about is not illegal.
> > To be illegal, the owner
Michael Robinson schreef:
> Downloading commercial software that you own a copy of for personal
> use is not illegal. Downloading old commercial software that isn't
>
I'm not even sure this is allowed. A lot of software was distributed on
physical media, of which you were allowed to make a c
Speaking of abandonware, all the Nintendo games for the original
8 bit system fit that description now. Should anyone distribute
an emulator to run the old games on PC's? Should anyone distribute
instructions on how to get a rom image of an old game so a person
can play it on his/her PC? Would
> Downloading commercial software that you own a copy of for personal
> use is not illegal. Downloading old commercial software that isn't
> sold anymore which the author doesn't care about is not illegal.
> To be illegal, the owner of the intellectual property has to raise
> suit and why would th
> But just to say the last word about this thread: please avoid warez,
> sources and links to any other illegal activities.
>
> Thanks.
> Aitor
Downloading commercial software that you own a copy of for personal
use is not illegal. Downloading old commercial software that isn't
sold anymore wh
Hello,
2009/4/13 Michael Robinson :
> know of. Technically, if the author of a proprietary program
> doesn't care about it anymore, sharing it isn't a legal problem.
That is plain wrong. Many old games are back-to-life thanks to mobile
phones, and it just evidences that the authors keep the copy
Eric, was the "windows" (partial) support" ever ported to the stable
kernel? (maybe that's why).
Aitor
2009/4/12 Eric Auer :
>
> Hi,
>
>> Not workgroup.
>>
>> If I don't load emm386.exe, freedos version, I get an error that I
>> have an unsupported dos version.
>>
>> If I try loading windows 3.1
Besides the idea is completely other (and not bad at all, if you ask
me). Appart from realtime compression, I think you save a lot from the
variable-sectors-per-cluster approach... (Just the reason why a file
of 1 byte of size may get compressed on a 1:32 ratio ;) ).
Aitor
2009/4/12 Eric Auer :
>
Eric, what I meant is: see how many people writes to us telling that
the MS-DOS-style MENUing in CONFIG.SYS does not work in FreeDOS, so I
guess we would be flooded with messages like: "I wrote with LFNs to a
disk, and Windows no longer recognises the filenames, and has the
FILE4~1.TXT form instead
2009, San Francisco.
>>> 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
>>> Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
>>> ___
>>> Freedos-user mailing list
>>> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforg
u want , i've written some suggestion for Wavelan (wlan) under dos and
> arachne browser.
> Dos drivers , text, utilities for wifi can also found at :
>
> www.perotti.ic.cz/wavelan/
>
> Cheers
>
> Iw2evk roberto
>
__ Hinweis von ESET NOD32 Antivirus, Sig
>>> If you're waiting for further improvements to 2038 before you release
>>> 2038, then you're doing this wrong. [...] I'd strongly recommend
>>> making 2038 available, and putting the "few pending improvements" in
>>> 2039.
>> The problem is that Eric holds back at least three necessary patches,
13 matches
Mail list logo
