On Apr 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Adam Norton wrote:
> Also I remember from my pre dot net days using a program which would
> inspect a dll and identify all the public methods/functions that it
> has.
> Would this be considered legal? If so anyone remember what that
> program is/was? I used it at a
Is it still possible to use FDUPDATE on FreeDOS 1.0 or to upgrade 1.0
to 1.1? I think FDUPDATE detects when you're running 1.0 and won't
update, but I'm not sure how it does this.
-maybeway36
--
This SF.net email is sponso
Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> Christian Masloch schreef:
>
>> Since disassembling MS-DOS is "considered legal" by UDOS and RBIL authors
>> (and these sources are "considered legal" by all members of the FreeDOS
>> project) I think there's no problem using some DLL examination tool.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
Christian Masloch schreef:
> Since disassembling MS-DOS is "considered legal" by UDOS and RBIL authors
> (and these sources are "considered legal" by all members of the FreeDOS
> project) I think there's no problem using some DLL examination tool.
>
> Regards,
> Christian
>
I hope you have h
There's several editors with source, and several more that are still
being supported (qedit and vedit for 2) any number of the source ones
could easily be taken and included into freedos. One I particularly
liked was called Great Little Word Processor (glwp) and came with
pascal source. I
