> Better than watcom? How much better and in which areas?
In Open Watcom just the 32bit C(++) compiler and WD are pretty good. The rest
is of "mixed" quality.
With optimisation on MSVC CL.EXE beats OW WCC.EXE significantly both in speed
and binary size (not counting the CRT part).
One re
Hi!
17-Янв-2007 01:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
hc> 1) The very first entry is:
hc> !SWITCHES=/E
hc> I don't see this entry listed in the FreeDos help file as a Config.sys
hc> command - what is it / what does it do ??
"Switches" pass
Norbert Remmel wrote:
> is there anyone out there who still owns an early Microsoft C compiler
> which can be run under plain DOS?
May be you can use DJGPP: http://www.delorie.com/
Guillermo "Ñuño" Martínez
-
Take Surveys
"Arkady V.Belousov" wrote:
> Better than watcom? How much better and in which areas?
MS Visual C++ 1.5x can successfully compile 4DOS sources. ;-)
A note from http://www.4dos.hit.bg/: '"Porting" to another compiler will
be hard to do as the _TEXT segment is almost full and all the other
com
Hi!
17-Янв-2007 17:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Japheth) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
J> I own MS VC 1.5 which runs in DOS with the Phar Lab TNT DOS Extender.
J> IMO it is the best 16-bit C(++) optimising compiler :)
Better than watcom? How much better and in which areas?
---
