Hi,
Blair Campbell wrote:
> both are not correct, as the second one would need to be prefixed with SET to
> work correctly.
The source of the confusion is that PATH is both a command and an
environment variable. The PATH command sets the PATH environment
variable, but nothing prevents you from
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:41:21 +0300, you wrote:
Hi,
> Q-drivers are positioned by their author as opposition for FreeDOS
>project and its contributors, because authors thinks we all are "NAZI".
This is not true, a single word different means millions of mis-understanding.
1) The author don't
Not at all. mytempdir is quite slow. If you can provide
another site, I can upload them tomorrow.
Mark
Johnson Lam wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:48:00 -0500, you wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I have updated my procedure and bootable CD for installing
>> FreeDOS on almost any WindowsXP computer. You
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:48:00 -0500, you wrote:
Hi,
>I have updated my procedure and bootable CD for installing
>FreeDOS on almost any WindowsXP computer. You can install
>FreeDOS beside WindowsXP without damaging the WindowsXP
>installation.
Great!
>The download links will be valid for three w
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:43:14 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
>How about licensing? Is qxumbpci GPL/open source?
Free and closed-source (sorry).
>If it is closed source it may give you better performance, but you
>risk that the program may be abandoned and no-one to be able to take
>it back.
Correct.
R
There's also another one called XFS (not to be confused with the
file-system) and probably some more. XFS IIRC was distributed with
old versions of SuSE Linux.
On 11/27/06, Sylvain Lavoie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >I know no NFS drivers for DOS, but there
>
> Actually, there is suc
Hello,
>I know no NFS drivers for DOS, but there
Actually, there is such a thing as a DOS NFS client! It's old but it
works. I'm using Tsoft's NFS Client 1.02. It uses the WatTCP TCP/IP
stack. Check this site to download a trial copy:
http://www.rawbandwidth.com/software/nfs/download.html
Hi!
27-Ноя-2006 14:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> >> BC> So who is for making HELLO=blah equal to SET HELLO=blah in FreeCOM?
>> I see no reasons for this (this not adds required/used functionality),
>> especially this will eat extra memo
Hi!
27-Ноя-2006 09:29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lester) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> How about licensing? Is qxumbpci GPL/open source?
>> If it is closed source it may give you better performance, but you
>> risk that the program may be abandoned and no-one to be able to take
>> it ba
On 11/27/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 27-Ноя-2006 13:14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
> freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>
> >> BC> So who is for making HELLO=blah equal to SET HELLO=blah in FreeCOM?
> >> Where you see this? Lester was just ask if
Hi!
27-Ноя-2006 13:14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> BC> So who is for making HELLO=blah equal to SET HELLO=blah in FreeCOM?
>> Where you see this? Lester was just ask if this possible or not. No one
>> was discuss adding support for this (
Well, the source code's already been written, but I'd like a few more
people's OK :-).
On 11/27/06, Florian Xaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the idea. Sounds very practical.
>
> Bye
> Flo
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:33:10 +0100, Blair Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Any par
I like the idea. Sounds very practical.
Bye
Flo
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:33:10 +0100, Blair Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Any particular reason?
>
> On 11/27/06, Florian Xaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No.
>>
>> Bye Flo
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:57:21 +0100, Blair Campbell <
Any particular reason?
On 11/27/06, Florian Xaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No.
>
> Bye Flo
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:57:21 +0100, Blair Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > So who is for making HELLO=blah equal to SET HELLO=blah in FreeCOM?
> > And according to POSIX, %PWD% is suppos
No.
Bye Flo
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:57:21 +0100, Blair Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> So who is for making HELLO=blah equal to SET HELLO=blah in FreeCOM?
> And according to POSIX, %PWD% is supposed to be set to the current
> directory by CD. Is anyone against adding these features?
>
>
On 11/27/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 27-Ноя-2006 12:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
> freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>
> >> Who says about "HELLO="? We discuss "PATH " and "PATH=".
> >> PS: As I understand, this is another bug/feature, like "c
Hi!
27-Ноя-2006 12:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>> Who says about "HELLO="? We discuss "PATH " and "PATH=".
>> PS: As I understand, this is another bug/feature, like "cd.." and "echo.".
BC> So who is for making HELLO=blah equal to SET HEL
So who is for making HELLO=blah equal to SET HELLO=blah in FreeCOM?
And according to POSIX, %PWD% is supposed to be set to the current
directory by CD. Is anyone against adding these features?
On 11/27/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 27-Ноя-2006 11:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But a DOS player would be much nicer... ;-)
btw: Some BIOS version have "Legacy Sound" option, which provides SB16
compatiblity. MPXPLAY also supports some modern cards AND have support of
networks (ask the author!!).
Bye
Flo
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:14:53 +0100, Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
27-Ноя-2006 11:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
BC> Well I don't understand why PATH=blah blah would be accepted but
BC> HELLO=blah blah wouldn't work.
>> >> L> PATH %DOSDIR%\BIN
>> >> L> PATH=%DOSDIR%\BIN
>> Both are accepted by MS-comma
Hi Samuel,
short answer is yes, you can use DOS to create a networked
music player on a PC with a modern soundcard, but no, you
cannot get all your wishes implemented for free :-).
> Is it possible to install freedos on a 266 mhz pII ibm thinkpad laptop
> with a wifi network card (pcmcia) and pl
Hello
Is it possible to install freedos on a 266 mhz pII ibm thinkpad laptop with a
wifi network card (pcmcia) and play music over smb or nfs with my crystal
something sound card? Or is it simply not possible because freedos have no
multitasking (?) or there are no driver for my sound card or w
Good day, everyone:
I have updated my procedure and bootable CD for installing
FreeDOS on almost any WindowsXP computer. You can install
FreeDOS beside WindowsXP without damaging the WindowsXP
installation.
The key programs are GParted, for shrinking the WindowsXP disk
partition and creating a p
Well I don't understand why PATH=blah blah would be accepted but
HELLO=blah blah wouldn't work.
On 11/27/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 27-Ноя-2006 11:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
> freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>
> BC> both are not correct, as t
Hi!
27-Ноя-2006 11:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
BC> both are not correct, as the second one would need to be prefixed with
BC> SET to work correctly.
>> L> PATH %DOSDIR%\BIN
>> L> PATH=%DOSDIR%\BIN
>> Both.
Both are accepted by MS-c
both are not correct, as the second one would need to be prefixed with
SET to work correctly.
On 11/27/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 26-Ноя-2006 04:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lester) wrote to
> freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>
> L> Ok, and now, which syntax is correct:
Hi!
26-Ноя-2006 04:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lester) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
L> Ok, and now, which syntax is correct:
L> PATH %DOSDIR%\BIN
L> or
L> PATH=%DOSDIR%\BIN
Both.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. In
Hi Lester,
only if software is not only free but also open source, it
is possible that other people take care of projects again
which were abandoned for a while. Actually this happened
for several FreeDOS tools before... So we try to put only
open source software in our distro, but from time to t
Here is Eric's comment (sent by private email). I decided to post it here
because someone else might find it useful as well.
-
L: which version of the following commands in Fdauto.bat is correct?
Eric:
- version 1 is correct
- version 2: dos has no way to know that "temp" is not the nam
> Aitor Santamaría:
>
> How about licensing? Is qxumbpci GPL/open source?
>
> If it is closed source it may give you better performance, but you
> risk that the program may be abandoned and no-one to be able to take
> it back.
I assume this message is directed to FreeDos official SourceForge pro
30 matches
Mail list logo
