Well, I tought you only want to specify stacks if the program you are
loading doesnt have a stack segment of it own.
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
No so. When dealing many years with stacks=0,0, I found only only
AT386 refurbished machine, which hangs with this setting at loading
Win3.1. Al
Hi!
Lester Vedrox wrote:
I'm trying to customize startup files and have a few questions.
1) STACKS=9,256. STACKS=0,0 seem a bit risky
No so. When dealing many years with stacks=0,0, I found only only
AT386 refurbished machine, which hangs with this setting at loading Win3.1.
All other
Hi!
Henrique Peron wrote:
What I meant was:
The user will be using the characters available on VGA BIOS, because it
is the default.
I didn't mean that KEYB would be loading the characters on VGA BIOS.
From your sentences, which are intermixed by mentions of KEYB, this
is not clear. An
What I meant was:
The user will be using the characters available on VGA BIOS, because it is
the default.
I didn't mean that KEYB would be loading the characters on VGA BIOS.
- Original Message -
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 9:46 AM
Hi!
Henrique Peron wrote:
If you haven't prepared and selected any cp (codepage), then you'll be using
the character
table implemented in the BIOS of your VGA adapter which,
[...]
if you run KEYB under these conditions,
Video adapter BIOS doesn't implements INT16, this service is
com
Hi!
Blair Campbell пишет:
INSTALL= commands are always executed AFTER the SHELL line because all
INSTALL does is call %SHELL% to execute the command
No. Kernel executes programs from INSTALL directly, without shell help.
---
Using Tom
