> You should understand that Jim and others have given up
> trying to keep Jack happy, basically. I tend to join them.
Count me in too. I have personally never used the Q drivers and will
distribute the X drivers with my distro because I am NOT violating any
license whatsoever.
--
Fall is my fav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Johnson Lam wrote:
> I'm no laywer, solicitor. I guess maybe technically Jack violate the
> GPL (I don't really know), but I think from the very beginning of GPL
> spirit is from the author want to share the work with others, if the
> people did some
# On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:25:05 -0400, "Scott Mayo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#
# > Since I've joined the list, I've had one or two people suggest other
# > operating systems, and a bunch of people bickering of the ownership of
# > some wretched piece of software. No one has stepped up and suggest
Hi!
Since I've joined the list, I've had one or two people suggest other
operating systems, and a bunch of people bickering of the ownership of
some wretched piece of software. No one has stepped up and suggested that
FreeDOS is going to do what I need. Should I take this as a hint that I'm
look
I'd originally posted, asking if FreeDOS is right for my application.
Since I've joined the list, I've had one or two people suggest other
operating systems, and a bunch of people bickering of the ownership of
some wretched piece of software. No one has stepped up and suggested that
FreeDOS is goi
Hi Johnson,
> 1) Jack don't want to let people think his work is "a part of
> FreeDOS", he didn't ask ALL the people to remove the XDMA source, just
> don't want it on FreeDOS server
Fewer people will use XDMA when it is no longer included with FreeDOS.
> 2) He didn't limit anyone to use the XD
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:57:36 +0300, you wrote:
Hi Lucho,
>Do you see now why I retired from the FreeDOS development?
Yes, sadly.
>I view of all latest events I must say that however I admire Jack's
>work, Shane, Eric and Jim are right. It was me who sent the "deleted"
>XDMA to Jim to add to h
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:29:40 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
>What a load of nonsense this is.
If you talk about the GPL, there're misunderstanding here.
>That was not a particularly useful thing to do Johnson.
I think you missed some scene here, so I don't want to talk about the
"personal matter" betwe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi everyone
The FreeDOS Beta9sr2 distribution has some errors with the installer,
and needs to be replaced. I'm having a look at the CD ISO and the
floppy image this week.
Does anyone have a neat list of what updated files could go into a new
Fre
Hi all,
Shane is right. As is Jim. You cannot remove GPL from a software.
So you cannot force us to delete XCDROM and XDMA. And, why should
we? They are good software and you do not allow us to use the
better QCDROM and QDMA instead. You can do the latter, because as
the author, you can release a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
What a load of nonsense this is.
Johnson Lam wrote:
> Forward an email from Jack, hoping everyone can understand what's
> going on, I'd like the others to understand the whole thing, not out
> of context:
That was not a particularly useful thing to
coralline algae wrote:
> At that point the vendor said oh sorry you need to buy one of our pc's
> as we only support spp mode and we can supply that pc hardware.
SPP stands for 'Standard Parallel Port'. But the PS/2 bidirectional port
is a standard port with input mode capability, enabled via bi
12 matches
Mail list logo
