Hi Johnson,
> Glad you make new version of EDIT, but since Joe still releasing his
> "own" EDIT, better NOT to have too many "forked" version here.
The problem is that Joe is very often away. For example you can KNOW
that there is EDIT 0.82, but his homepage still only mentions the 4/2004
versio
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 02:34:27 +0200 (MEST), you wrote:
Hi Eric,
Sorry for me not being "smooth" talking ...
>Hi, thanks to Bothie helping me out while there are problems
>with uploading things to my page, you can now enjoy the new
>EDIT 0.7d PREVIEW version :-). It is a preview version because
>t
Hi, while it would be easy to remove the "write new empty partition
table if reading the partition table failed" nonsense from FDISK,
would it be against the FreeDOS SPECS to just replace it by, say,
XFDISK? I mean, XFDISK is open source. It only does not LOOK like
the old MS DOS user interface, b
Hi, thanks to Bothie helping me out while there are problems
with uploading things to my page, you can now enjoy the new
EDIT 0.7d PREVIEW version :-). It is a preview version because
there are several help text things which are still to be fixed,
so if you want to support your FreeDOS developers
Hi!
22-Июл-2005 10:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carl William Spitzer IV) wrote to
FreeDOS :
>> kn> What's the size limit on a partition for the FreeDOS kernel?
>> 2 Gb for FAT16 partition, 2 Tb for the FAT32 partition. But all
>> programs, which use only 32-bit arithmetics and use plain old DOS fun
At 08:36 PM 7/22/2005 +0100, Gerry Hickman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, I consider this bug extremely serious.
I agree, and Michael's post would appear to confirm that FDISK is far from
read-only, but has this bug always been there, or is it only in recent
development builds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, I consider this bug extremely serious.
I agree, and Michael's post would appear to confirm that FDISK is far
from read-only, but has this bug always been there, or is it only in
recent development builds?
If it's always been there, why have more people
Hi:
Thanks. I know all of these workarounds. The problem was an apparent
bug in an older version of FreeDOS sys.com.
Mark
> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 17:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello, all:
> >
> > Back to my other laptop and other problem. I am unable to install
> > FreeDOS on my 477 M
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 17:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yeah, some people just don't like WindowsXP. It's hard to
> buy a new computer without it installed, though!
>
File a microsoft refund form. Then install your favorite dos and your
favorite distro and enjoy.
--
+-
On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 15:22, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 16-Июл-2005 00:07 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote to
> freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>
>
> kn> What's the size limit on a partition for the FreeDOS kernel?
>
> 2 Gb for FAT16 partition, 2 Tb for the FAT32 par
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 17:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello, all:
>
> Back to my other laptop and other problem. I am unable to install
> FreeDOS on my 477 MB FAT32 partition. This is a DIFFERENT laptop
> entirely. There is an extended partition, and an NTFS partition.
> The FAT32 partition i
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 16:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello, all:
>
> I just suggested that someone who was having trouble with
> NTFS4DOS not recognizing an NTFS partition run fdisk with the
> development kernel.
When was your last virus check? When you did a clean install did you
make a boot
Anyone know if Brian is on fd-user list? or otherwise been notified of
these issues?
I don't think it will be too difficult to correct (warn/abort at least)
so maybe if I get time after work tommorrow I'll make a patch available
to make fdisk safer to use.
Thanks for reviewing the code,
Jere
13 matches
Mail list logo
