Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS in the news

2004-11-12 Thread Jim Hall
Yup, Jeremy is right in his recollection. The FreeDOS Spec is out of date (as has been pointed out before) and needs to be updated. There was a general discussion on the FreeDOS lists a while back, after OpenWatcom became available, that OW was largely compatible with BC code, and the only tr

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS in the news

2004-11-12 Thread Kenneth J. Davis
Steve Nickolas - Using Windoze wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sory for this extremely late answer, but what i meant was: when did the FreeDOS spec get changed? Imre Such a change would be news to me. To my knowledge the standard is still Borland C++ 3.10 and TASM, or Turbo C++ 1.01 and Arrowsof

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS in the news

2004-11-12 Thread Steve Nickolas - Using Windoze
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sory for this extremely late answer, but what i meant was: when did the FreeDOS spec get changed? Imre Such a change would be news to me. To my knowledge the standard is still Borland C++ 3.10 and TASM, or Turbo C++ 1.01 and Arrowsoft ASM for a lower denominator that's f

Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS in the news

2004-11-12 Thread ileber
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>Today, the standard C compiler is OpenWatcom, and the standard assembler >>> >>> >>is NASM. Both are Free Software. >> >>Did I miss something? >> >>Imre >> >> >> >OpenWatcom is free and supports OS/2(eCS), Windows and DOS. >http://www.openwatcom.org > Sory for th