Sender, InterScan has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment.
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:28:50 +0200
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File: document.pif
Action: clean failed - deleted
Virus: WORM_NETSKY.D
--
Hi Eric,
Hi Eric,
>> >or parallel link cables (wiring instructions included).
> * Yes it DOES support printer port, as LapLink.
Oop! I miss ... Impressive! Need to try.
>You can install an LFN driver. And p2p stuff is mostly wasting bandwidth.
>People are leeching like crazy, f
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:56:45 -0300, you wrote:
Hi Carlos,
Thanks for introducing WBAT!
I got it's homepage and there're lot of DOS utilities:
http://home.mnet-online.de/horst.muc
And Bart's Network Boot Disk also use WBAT:
http://www.nu2.nu
Rgds,
Johnson.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:27:37 +0200 (MEST), you wrote:
Hi Eric,
>> >or parallel link cables (wiring instructions included).
> * Yes it DOES support printer port, as LapLink.
Oop! I miss ... Impressive!
>You can install an LFN driver. And p2p stuff is mostly wasting bandwidth.
>P
Hi, I am proud to have finished the first version of my inofficial
FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list on:
http://www.coli.uni-sb.de/~eric/stuff/soft/specials/freedos-inofficial-1.0-todo-list.html
Features:
- post 1.0 items are included and marked in a separate color
(all link to http://www.freedos.org/news
I have one sugestion as I have made before, but the only problem is that
this program is not free.
It's a program called "wbat" and creates Dialog boxes for DOS batch:
* menus, buttons, input fields, checkboxes, radio buttons, list
selection
Easy handling, no ANSI stuff to deal with - colors
Hi Johnson!
> >FileMaven - a file manager ... with ... and: A file transfer
> >module! You can run one instance in "host mode" and then open a
> >connection from another FileMaven on another PC. Transfer uses serial
> >or parallel link cables (wiring instructions included).
* Ye
Hi!
19-Июл-2004 14:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd Blaauw) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> FD-HIMEM under FreeDOS uses 2.03k of low memory, MS-HIMEM - 47.8k. Ant
>>this is not much more, than 1.14k of MS-HIMEM under MS-DOS.
BB> as told, the 47.8KB usage is a bug in MS's kernel (IO.SYS , dos 7.10,
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi!
Just install FreeDOS and you will notice which programs have message
catalog files :-) For my system:
ls nls
choice.de diskcopy.de find.es help.de localize.en pause.ensort.en
choice.en diskcopy.en find.hu help.en more.de runtime.de sort.es
choice.hu
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:44:30 +0200 (MEST), you wrote:
Hi,
>FileMaven - a file manager (one window on the left, one on the right,
>drop down menu with hotkey control, text mode, 25 or 50 lines) with
>support for some archives (ZIP...), encryption and: A file transfer
>module! You can run one insta
Hi, a FreeDOS user found two nice (closed source) freeware programs:
FileMaven - a file manager (one window on the left, one on the right,
drop down menu with hotkey control, text mode, 25 or 50 lines) with
support for some archives (ZIP...), encryption and: A file transfer
module! You can run on
Arkady V.Belousov schreef:
EA> is at best simplistic (okay, ClamAV ClamScan is not ;-)),
EA> our HIMEM does not load parts of itself to HMA,
FD-HIMEM under FreeDOS uses 2.03k of low memory, MS-HIMEM - 47.8k. Ant
this is not much more, than 1.14k of MS-HIMEM under MS-DOS.
EA> make HIMEM load par
Steve Nickolas - Using Windoze escribió:
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote:
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS
does not have one either.
Everybody agrees?
Personally I agree. I think MS-DOS 6.20+ is the only DOS with a
surface scanner? DR-DOS
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:35:06 +0200, you wrote:
Hi,
>>I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS
>>does not have one either.
>>
>Everybody agrees?
Scandisk can be later, but the CHKDSK or DOSFSCK still have FAT32
problem. IMO at least one program should work correctly.
R
Aitor Santamaría Merino wrote:
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS
does not have one either.
Everybody agrees?
Personally I agree. I think MS-DOS 6.20+ is the only DOS with a surface
scanner? DR-DOS 7, does it have one? PC DOS 7 certainly d
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
I think we can postpone SCANDISK to post-1.0, for example PC-DOS
does not have one either.
Everybody agrees?
PS: Shrinking DISPLAY to half size should be easy (it now has 2 buffers
for each font size I think), just let the 2nd buffer reside e.g. in XMS.
Changes are on
Hi!
19-Июл-2004 03:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EA> is at best simplistic (okay, ClamAV ClamScan is not ;-)),
EA> our HIMEM does not load parts of itself to HMA,
FD-HIMEM under FreeDOS uses 2.03k of low memory, MS-HIMEM - 47.8k. Ant
this is not much more, tha
17 matches
Mail list logo