Actually on second thoughts...
> Feel free to ask me off the list about the major stakeholders.
>
I... V...
- http://www.intellectualventures.com/team.aspx
-
http://www.google.com/cse?cx=009769889648163667259%3A--bpnuf3ado&q=related%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.intellectualventures.com%2Fteam.
Anyone interested in this thread should perhaps attend the seminar,
"lnventing to transform lndia" being organized by
"The National Academy of Sciences, India" and "lntelIectual Ventures" (
http://www.intellectualventures.com) at IITD.
Might seem off topic, but one would be surprised with "what a s
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:02 PM, "Sankarshan (সঙ্কর্ষণ)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ravindra patake wrote:
>
>> In one hand we say that our CSIR research outputs have no use because it
>> always remain in journals none is applied in reality or commercialized and
>> on the other hand if CSIR is al
On Monday 06 Oct 2008, ravi singh wrote:
> why there is much contradiction on this topic?
> we should know that we have spent a lot of time and money for haldi
> win from america. if one remember.
> if CSIR is going to creating patents and erecting barriers to safe
> guard their research, then it
ravi singh wrote:
> if CSIR is going to creating patents and erecting barriers to safe guard
> their research, then it would be better than if, customs and culture for our
> natural herbs which we are using from very ancient time, other country like
> america claim for haldi and amla and others
why there is much contradiction on this topic?
we should know that we have spent a lot of time and money for haldi win from
america. if one remember.
if CSIR is going to creating patents and erecting barriers to safe guard
their research, then it would be better than if, customs and culture for o
ravindra patake wrote:
> In one hand we say that our CSIR research outputs have no use because it
> always remain in journals none is applied in reality or commercialized and
> on the other hand if CSIR is allowing to use something that could be
> applied, that could be come in reality then why we
2008/10/6 "Sankarshan (সঙ্কর্ষণ)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> tirveni yadav wrote:
> > CSIR (India's largest publicly funded research and development body)
> plans
> > to monetize its patents.
>
> What does 'monetize its patents' mean ? I have this strong urge to visit
> bullshitbingo.net after reading
On Monday 06 Oct 2008, Sankarshan (সঙ্কর্ষণ) wrote:
> tirveni yadav wrote:
> > CSIR (India's largest publicly funded research and development
> > body) plans to monetize its patents.
>
> What does 'monetize its patents' mean ? I have this strong urge to
> visit bullshitbingo.net after reading the
tirveni yadav wrote:
> CSIR (India's largest publicly funded research and development body) plans
> to monetize its patents.
What does 'monetize its patents' mean ? I have this strong urge to visit
bullshitbingo.net after reading the article though (so many weasel words)...
>
> But creating patents and erecting barriers to safe guard their research
> from the
> citizens of this country who are paying their salary and funding their
> research is
> cheating of the worst kind.
>
If, after monetization, their research grants are reduced or stopped, would
it be fair?
Sa
CSIR (India's largest publicly funded research and development body) plans
to monetize its patents.
I wonder why a publicly funded organisation need to have patents ,
These organisations get their funding from the government of india,
which is to be spent for the benefit of the people of this cou
12 matches
Mail list logo
