On Wednesday 05 September 2012 01:20:10 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 28 August 2012 21:00, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > The default (most things as modules) kernel build is still ~ 3.5mb.
> > That's rather large for a board with 16MB of RAM.
> >
> > Additionally, I can't load the ath device after the syst
On Saturday 22 September 2012 02:05:23 Derrick Edwards wrote:
> Thanks again for looking into this.
> My main concern was the range of network performance that I was getting
> when the laptop was right in front of the access point. As you can see
> bandwith varied greatly.
I don't know if it
te to -HEAD, then use 'athratestats' on the peer MAC address. It's
> quite useful to see what's actually going on. :-)
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> On 22 September 2012 01:20, Johann Hugo wrote:
> > On Saturday 22 September 2012 02:05:23 Derrick Edwards wrote:
Hi
Finally got a 11n test setup running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT on two ARM boards.
HW = gateworks ARM
OS = FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT
Build = arm-10-20121011
Wifi = RouterBOARD R52nM = AR9220
11n works if one device is in AP mode and the other in ST mode, but I can get
it running with both devices in AD
0 794uS 292323
[54 Mb: 250] 27:27 (100.0%) 27/ 0 444uS 292478
[54 Mb:1600] 9767:9767 (100.0%)10518/ 0 648uS 292477
>
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> On 18 October 2012 00:34, Johann Hugo wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Finally got a 11
Hi
What difference in throuput can one expect between ht/20 and a ht/40 ?
Johann
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@free
g.
> >
> >
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> > On 18 October 2012 00:52, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> Ah, it looks like the MCS rate stuff isn't being setup or negotiated
> >> right?
> >>
> >> Please file a bug. I'm not sure if I&#
The following reply was made to PR kern/172955; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Johann Hugo
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: Adrian Chadd ,
jh...@meraka.csir.co.za
Subject: misc/172955: [ath] 11n does not work in adhoc mode
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:19:21 +0200
--Boundary-00
On Tuesday 23 October 2012 09:33:42 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Ok- the problem here is that unfortunately the adhoc code doesn't do
> any of the HT field parsing or "upgrading".
>
> Adding the parsing isn't enough, it still doesn't properly negotiate
> HT on both ends, so it doesn't upgrade the rate co
On Tuesday 23 October 2012 23:29:16 Chuck Burns wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 2:23 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > I'd really appreciate someone stepping in here. I'm trying to finish
> > off the power save queue handling changes and then move to finishing
> > correcting the ps-poll support. Then I have the w
On Monday 22 October 2012 16:09:50 you wrote:
> On 22 October 2012 06:56, Johann Hugo wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > What difference in throuput can one expect between ht/20 and a ht/40 ?
>
> If you're hitting best possible circumstances? Almost 2x.
>
Is this more or
On Friday 26 October 2012 14:56:42 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 26 October 2012 05:06, Johann Hugo wrote:
> > Is this more or less the troughput what one should expect:
> >
> > a/20 = 29.7 Mbits/sec
> >
> > ht/20 = 40.6 Mbits/sec
> >
> > ht/40 = 44.1
On Sunday 18 November 2012 23:05:44 adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Synopsis: [ath] ath1: bad series0 hwrate 0x0, tries 1 ts_status 0x0
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: adrian
> State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 18 21:04:51 UTC 2012
> State-Changed-Why:
> This was fixed in r243047
Where can I find some more info on how to configure TDMA and what things one
can tweak.
Johann
On Friday 23 November 2012 08:03:44 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 17 November 2012 15:57, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Now, after the work done last year to make the 11n NICs work, I
> > haven't sat down and tr
On Sunday, December 09, 2012 04:18:45 PM Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Ok, I've just taught the aggressive mode logic about IBSS. It's pretty
> dirty - I may cop some hate for enabling aggressive mode for IBSS as
> each IBSS node doesn't know about the overall voice/video data rates.
> That's how it works
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 01:58:38 AM Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Here's what I have trimmed this down to so far:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/ath/20121212-11n-ibss-and-other-stuff-3.di
> ff
>
> Please disable ampdu for now (ifconfig wlanX -ampdu) as it just plain
> doesn't work.
> I'll
Which vendors are you talking about. Are you planing to add support for any of
them.
We have a UHF wifi pilot project and was thinking of doing a frequency down
convert to UHF.
Johann
On Monday 22 July 2013 10:35:27 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Well, the UHF stuff is available now and vendors are mak
Hi
Is half/quarter width working for Atheros 5413 (looks like it) ?
https://wiki.freebsd.org/dev/ath_hal(4)/HalfQuarterRate
Will the output of "ifconfig -v wlan2" show if it is supported ?
Is it supported in FreeBSD 9.0 or do I need to upgrade to CURRENT ?
Do I need compile time flags/option
Hi
Are there any special settings needed to operate a 11n adapter in 11a mode ?
e.g. dev.ath.0.rxantenna
I've managed to get it into 11a mode, but for some reason more that 80% of all
big packets are dropped, small packets works fine.
mesh-6c9a:~ # uname -a
FreeBSD mesh-6c9a 11.0-CURRENT Fre
Hi
After an upgrade from FreeBSD 9.0 to 11.0 I'm losing comms to some of the wifi
clients that worked when I was using FreeBSD 9.0 (long distance links in mesh)
On CURRENT the devices are still showing with list sta, but the idle counter
keeps growing + no comms to them.
FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE
m
beacons only)
Antenna profile:
[0] tx 1012 rx0
[1] tx0 rx13114
>
> The RSSI's look fine. So there's likely something else odd going on
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 31 July 2014 13:00, Johann Hugo wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > After a
missing ACK's
19845bad FCS
5049 beacons received
28 average rssi (beacons only)
Antenna profile:
[0] tx 641 rx3
[1] tx0 rx 8487
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 31 July 2014 14:14, Johann Hugo wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 July 2014 13:43:34 A
ds with an Atheros 9220
chipset and not on older ones with an Atheros 5413 chipset.
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 31 July 2014 14:14, Johann Hugo wrote:
> > On Thursday 31 July 2014 13:43:34 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> >> I think the idle counter there is the receiv
0 0 0 12 0 0 28
6M
201 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 29
6M
400 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 27
6M
On Thursday 31 July 2014 16:01:56 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 31 July 2014 14:56, Joh
drian Chadd wrote:
Well, step #1 would be to run the freebsd-9 ath(4) driver in the later
freebsd version. If you're able to shoehorn that in, let's see if
that's the case.
-a
On 1 August 2014 02:20, Johann Hugo wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to disable ANI ?
How should we go
25 matches
Mail list logo
