Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 30 апреля 2013 г., 8:53:00:
AC> Any follow-up with the latest stuff in -HEAD? I'd like to see if the
AC> hardware queue is behaving how I think it is.
Sorry, was busy yesterday.
Sources: r250041, TDMA is enabled in kernel config.
Warm-up: 120 seconds of TCP, thr
Hi, i have a problem with my new laptop Asus X55VD which has Ralink's
RT5390 chip.
I described the problem here:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=39259
Can someone help or suggest anything, i'd really like to run FreeBSD on
this lappy and learn it from scratch.
Thanks,
p0
___
Try doing 'up' instead of 'up scan'; does it still lock up?
Adrian
On 30 April 2013 07:26, Goran Tepshic wrote:
> Hi, i have a problem with my new laptop Asus X55VD which has Ralink's
> RT5390 chip.
>
> I described the problem here:
>
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=39259
>
> Can
Hi,
I've no idea, unfortunately. You'd have to start adding kernel printfs
in the driver to see when the driver locks up. I can't be much more
help than that at the moment, sorry :(
Adrian
On 30 April 2013 08:29, Goran Tepshic wrote:
> Adrian, yes, exactly. Not sure why.
>
> On Apr 30, 201
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 09:16:09AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Multiple VAPs should be working. Doubly so on the AR5212 series hardware.
>
> adrian
Thanks Adrian.
When I start two separate hostapd daemons with the config files from my
previous post (and separate pidfiles), only the first one wo
On 30 April 2013 01:24, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Adrian.
> You wrote 30 апреля 2013 г., 8:53:00:
>
> AC> Any follow-up with the latest stuff in -HEAD? I'd like to see if the
> AC> hardware queue is behaving how I think it is.
> Sorry, was busy yesterday.
> Sources: r250041, TDMA is enab
Synopsis: [ath] review the use of ic_freq / ic_ieee / ic_flags / ichan->channel
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-wireless
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Apr 30 17:13:29 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.or
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 05:39:15PM +0200, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 09:16:09AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Multiple VAPs should be working. Doubly so on the AR5212 series hardware.
> >
> > adrian
>
> Thanks Adrian.
>
> When I start two separate hostapd daemons with the
Would you please file a PR?
The hostapd in the base system should support this with no problems.
I've tested this multiple times with no ill effects.
Thanks,
Adrian
On 30 April 2013 10:25, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 05:39:15PM +0200, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
>> On Mon,
Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 30 апреля 2013 г., 19:41:12:
>> Warm-up: 120 seconds of TCP, throughput osculate between 50 and
>> 100Mbit/, several BAR resets, no hangs.
AC> Ok. But did it negotiate A-MPDU?
I'm not sure. Both ends showed typical N speeds (Windows in
connection properties, F
Well, right now I'm trying to figure out whether there's a race
condition in setting up / enabling the TX queue that I haven't yet
seen before, or whether we've hit another one of those corner case
bugs in the TX queue handling.
I may add in a hack to the completion code that checks if the queue
i
11 matches
Mail list logo