Re: run vs urtwn

2015-05-04 Thread Gour
Felix Friedlander writes: > Hmm... unusual. Try removing that last line entirely - it doesn’t seem to > serve any useful purpose I can see. OK. Here it the error while building kernel module: Building kernel module... /usr/share/misc/windrv_stub.c:137:13: error: redefinition of typedef

Re: run vs urtwn

2015-05-04 Thread Felix Friedlander
> Hmm... unusual. Try removing that last line entirely - it doesn’t seem to serve any useful purpose I can see. > It sounds good and it would allow me to spare some bucks (Croatian kunas) if > the performance would be satisfying. Performance is generally OK with NDIS drivers, the only issue is

Re: run vs urtwn

2015-05-04 Thread Felix Friedlander
Could you send me the whole file? It’s hard to tell from just that line. Also, in answer to your previous question, no, you do not have to repeat the process with each OS upgrade. It will only need doing once, except maybe if you rebuild world and kernel. > On 4 May 2015, at 5:49 pm, Gour wrot

Re: run vs urtwn

2015-05-04 Thread Gour
Felix Friedlander writes: > or reply to this email if you need help. I dl-ed winxp64 driver and tried running: ndisgen Drt2870.inf Drt2870.sys but got: "ndiscvt: line 841: :syntax error." CONVERSION FAILED Line (last one) 841 of DrtDrt2870.inf is as follows: BaldEagle_SSID = "amz?;'seim

Re: run vs urtwn

2015-05-04 Thread Gour
Felix Friedlander writes: > If you are wanting to purchase an adapter, any of those 3 would be fine. So, there is no significant difference in quality between the rsu and urtwn drivers? > However, have you considered using your builtin NIC with ndis(4)? Well, I wanted to avoid extra hassle. :