.. as a side note, if someone has a laptop with an AR9565 (WB335) in
it, please test my HAL out and let me know how it goes.
I don't yet have one to test with but the HAL should "just work".
Thanks,
Adrian
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing lis
Did you remove ath/ath_hal/ath_rate_sample from your kernel config
file when you rebuilt?
The default system ships with ath/ath_hal/ath_rate_sample compiled
into the kernel rather than as modules.
Thanks,
Adrian
On 14 March 2013 19:57, Joshua Isom wrote:
> On 3/14/2013 9:20 PM, Adrian Chadd
On 3/14/2013 9:20 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Oh!
http://wikidevi.com/wiki/TP-LINK_TL-WDN4800
Silly me, I was reading the wrong number on my phone.
Yes, 0x0030 is Osprey (AR9380.)
kldload if_ath_pci too. :-)
Adrian
Something weird happened. My config has ath_pci listed, but then I get
thi
.. and here I am, hoping you're user #1 (with me being user #0) of this HAL. :)
Adrian
On 14 March 2013 19:20, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Oh!
>
> http://wikidevi.com/wiki/TP-LINK_TL-WDN4800
>
> Silly me, I was reading the wrong number on my phone.
>
> Yes, 0x0030 is Osprey (AR9380.)
>
> kldload if
Oh!
http://wikidevi.com/wiki/TP-LINK_TL-WDN4800
Silly me, I was reading the wrong number on my phone.
Yes, 0x0030 is Osprey (AR9380.)
kldload if_ath_pci too. :-)
Adrian
On 14 March 2013 19:18, Joshua Isom wrote:
> Not a laptop, but here's the vendor's website.
> http://www.tp-link.com/en/p
Not a laptop, but here's the vendor's website.
http://www.tp-link.com/en/products/details/?model=TL-WDN4800
On 3/14/2013 9:02 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
0x3112? What nic is that?
I'll go and take a quick look at the reference driver. Can you google
your laptop model and see what you can find?
A
0x3112? What nic is that?
I'll go and take a quick look at the reference driver. Can you google your
laptop model and see what you can find?
Adrian
Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T
On Mar 14, 2013 6:31 PM, Joshua Isom wrote:
On 3/13/2013 7:31 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 9
On 3/13/2013 7:31 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 9 March 2013 10:54, Adrian Chadd wrote:
What's tested:
* legacy, 1x1 and 2x2 HT20/HT40, STA mode
* AR9380 (1x1, 2x2 - 2/5ghz)
* AR9485 (1x1, 2ghz only)
I can now add two more NICs to this list:
* AR9390 (HB116)
* AR9462 (WB225)
Thanks,
Adrian
It's likely some hack done by the wifi vendors to "look good'.
There's a split between basic (Required) and extended rates. You don't
need to talk extended rates to associate.
So your tool(s) are demonstrably broken. You should be able to get
right up to 54mbit. :)
Adrian
On 14 March 2013 16:
Hello, Freebsd-wireless.
I've sniffed all WiFi networks in my apartments (a lot of them!) and
compare data in beacons. I found one strangeness:
Almost all networks (supported by SOHO soapbox-routers like
TP-Link, Zyxel and D-Link) announce rates 1b, 2b, 5.5b, 11b, 16, 24,
26 and 54Mbit/s
10 matches
Mail list logo