Hi,
since yesterday I have a weird problem. I cannot display VirtualBox
_guest_ consoles remotely anymore (the GUI for configuration works).
It worked two weeks ago and I am not aware of any changes.
I am running Virtualbox headless on a server but use the GUI for installs
when needed. I forwar
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On 11/05/14 00:29, Manas Bhatnagar wrote:
Install ports tree in a temporary location (another computer or
something), grab the required folder and move it to the computer that
you want to install the port on and do 'make install clean' ? probably
won't work like tha
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Peter Ross wrote:
since yesterday I have a weird problem. I cannot display VirtualBox
_guest_ consoles remotely anymore (the GUI for configuration works).
It worked two weeks ago and I am not aware of any changes.
I am running Virtualbox headless on a server but use the
Hi all,
I am running VirtualBox on a new server (a Dell T620).
Inside is Oracle Linux. I run a Java app and it is very slow to
start.
Memory should not be an issue. I have 32 GB and 8 GB for the VM.
The server has 2 Xeon CPUs with 4 core each (hypertthreated so VBox sees
16 CPUs).
I do no
Hi Nikos,
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On 11/11/14 00:39, Peter Ross wrote:
I was not brave enough to enable VIMAGE and VirtualBox on the same
server. But I may do that soon. I plan a major reconfiguration ca. end
of the year. I hope it is stable enough.
Just want to
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
(4) Not everyone uses bhyve. FreeBSD jails are an excellent virtualization
platform for FreeBSD. Jails are still very popular and
performant. VIMAGE makes jails even better by allowing per-jail
network stacks.
I am using jai
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Tinker wrote:
Looking at Capsicum, I think it has an even lower safety profile than NaCl -
my usecase might just run any beastly binary code, so the sandbox wall needs
to be the toughest you got, so using BHyVe here makes sense.
You could use jails..
- The kernel is boote
Hi,
I have a question:
I have a server with
- 2 Xeon E5-2609,
- 4 cores each
- 4 threads per core
On OS level, Linux and FreeBSD see 8 processors.
VirtualBox offers 16 CPUs as the maximal number for a VM.
I expected 32. How does this work?
Regards
Peter
_
P.S. More precisly, I expected VirtualBOx to see 8 or 32 CPUs.
In the past it was virtual CPU= "real" thread number, if I remember
correctly.
How many you give to a VM is a different matter.
Regards
Peter
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015, Peter Ross wrote:
Hi,
I have a question:
I have a s
Hi all,
I read through an older threat I kept in my archive. It started like this:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Udo Rader wrote:
As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors:
* bhyve
* KVM
* QEMU
* VirtualBox
.. and later Xen was mentioned.
I ask myself which of the sol
10 matches
Mail list logo