On 11/14/10 11:43 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
Julian,
this sort of dovetails into something I've been thinking about for
a while,
which is NUMA support.
really good thoughts, but bad timing and wrong target audience I
think.
I don't think the tho
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
Julian,
this sort of dovetails into something I've been thinking about for a while,
which is NUMA support.
really good thoughts, but bad timing and wrong target audience I
think.
1) first of all you want the basic underlying OS support all sort of
On 11/13/10 8:27 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/13/10 2:13 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/13/10 1:55 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Julian
Elischer wrote:
Was this brought up in any of the discussions?
http://www.7he
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/13/10 2:13 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/13/10 1:55 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Julian Elischer
wrote:
Was this brought up in any of the discussions?
http://www.7he.at/freebsd/vps/
no it was not brought up.
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi Julian,
It was only a short discussion among "non developers" during a short breakout
session.
the session was "what is this VIMAGE/jails thing"?
and was not a dev-summit meeting but an "introduction to vimage" for end
users.
Ok. Thanks for th
On 11/13/10 2:13 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/13/10 1:55 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Julian
Elischer wrote:
Was this brought up in any of the discussions?
http://www.7he.at/freebsd/vps/
no it was not brought up..
it was an unofficial non-planned discussion
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> We discussed this at MeetBSD last week and it woudl seem that the next
> big hurdle for virtualization would seem to be a good concept to allow
> jails to have virtual versions of various virtual devices..
>
> for example
>
> pf has been vi
On 11/13/10 1:55 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Was this brought up in any of the discussions?
http://www.7he.at/freebsd/vps/
no it was not brought up..
it was an unofficial non-planned discussion that errupted pretty much
spontaneously an a
On 11/13/10 1:30 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi Julian,
We discussed this at MeetBSD last week and it woudl seem that the next
big hurdle for virtualization would seem to be a good concept to allow
jails to have virtual versions of various virtual devi
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi Julian,
We discussed this at MeetBSD last week and it woudl seem that the next
big hurdle for virtualization would seem to be a good concept to allow
jails to have virtual versions of various virtual devices..
for example
pf has been virtualized
We discussed this at MeetBSD last week and it woudl seem that the next
big hurdle for virtualization would seem to be a good concept to allow
jails to have virtual versions of various virtual devices..
for example
pf has been virtualized (when IS that patch going to get committed?)
but pfsync
11 matches
Mail list logo
