On 22-5-2014 21:29, Nils Beyer wrote:
> I suppose you start your bhyved Linux instances using the "-A" switch (ACPI
> tables), right? If you feel interested, you can try to start them without the
> "-A" switch. For me, the boot process is now stucked at "Calibrating delay
> loop". As far as I under
On 22-5-2014 21:29, Nils Beyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> I've just completed merging and patching with Anish patches...
>> ONce that seems to run for my freebsd vm's, I'll start merging my
>> patches. And hope that it still works.
>
> Sounds good. I've tried some Linux versio
Hi,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> I've just completed merging and patching with Anish patches...
> ONce that seems to run for my freebsd vm's, I'll start merging my
> patches. And hope that it still works.
Sounds good. I've tried some Linux versions ranging from 2.6.32, 3.10.x,
3.11.10 to 3.12.8 u
On 2014-05-22 18:24, Nils Beyer wrote:
Hi Willem,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
[...]
With the new kernel, that is no longer the case. On a idle vm the CPU
load is like 6-7%
At the moment I'm running:
linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic_3.13.0-24.46_amd64
Now, that looks promising.
Is that with
Hi Willem,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> [...]
> With the new kernel, that is no longer the case. On a idle vm the CPU
> load is like 6-7%
>
> At the moment I'm running:
> linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic_3.13.0-24.46_amd64
Now, that looks promising.
Is that with or without your own bhyve-/SVM-
Hoi,
Just a point on the timeline
I think somebody asked why his CPU load was so high on AMD running linux.
I've completed compiling a "fresh" linux-kernel on my Ubuntu 14.04
system, installed and rebooted it.
And where previously a Linux-kernel would drain the CPUs it got assigned
to th
