> confirm this made a huge effect on a Xeon E3-1220, while it
(obviously) made no difference on a Ryzen 7 2700.
Bhyve is missing support for AMD AVIC, which is interrupt h/w assist
similar to Intel vAPIC. AVIC I think is available only in Ryzen gen1. It is
on my TODO list.
-Anish
On Wed, May 6,
On 2020-04-20 12:06, Jason Tubnor wrote:
On Mon., 20 Apr. 2020, 7:09 pm Felix Palmen, wrote:
Xeon are not affected, since they have vAPIC, so they should be already
running as fast as possible. Correct?
I don't know the details, but on my Xeon E3-1240L v5, it did have a huge
effect.
I co
On Mon., 20 Apr. 2020, 7:09 pm Felix Palmen, wrote:
>
> > Xeon are not affected, since they have vAPIC, so they should be already
> > running as fast as possible. Correct?
>
> I don't know the details, but on my Xeon E3-1240L v5, it did have a huge
> effect.
>
>
>
^^^ This.
Not all Xeon CPUs ha
* Andrea Venturoli [20200420 10:53]:
> First: this patch seems to apply cleanly to 12.1. Is it safe? At least worth
> testing?
I applied it to my 12.1-RELEASE before it was even committed to head --
the result is awesome.
> Xeon are not affected, since they have vAPIC, so they should be already
On 2020-04-19 19:23, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Hi,
r358848 has been MFC'd to stable/12
Hello.
Can I ask some questions about this?
First: this patch seems to apply cleanly to 12.1. Is it safe? At least
worth testing?
Second.
IIUIC it's useless to test this on an AMD system, since the pat
Hi,
r358848 has been MFC'd to stable/12
Zitat von Harry Schmalzbauer :
Am 22.10.2018 um 13:26 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
…
Test-Runs:
Each hypervisor had only the one bench-guest running, no other
tasks/guests were running besides system's native standard processes.
Since the time between
Am 22.10.2018 um 13:26 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
…
Test-Runs:
Each hypervisor had only the one bench-guest running, no other
tasks/guests were running besides system's native standard processes.
Since the time between powering up the guest and finishing logon
differed notably (~5s vs. ~20s)
Am 30.10.2018 um 02:09 schrieb Dustin Marquess:
It would be interesting to test running it under Xen with FreeBSD as the
dom0.
ACK, so do I think. This was on my to-check list, but had to be
postponed until the next HV project legitimates another test setup ;-)
Unfortunately I don't know much
It would be interesting to test running it under Xen with FreeBSD as the
dom0.
-Dustin
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 1:04 PM Harry Schmalzbauer
wrote:
> Am 22.10.2018 um 13:26 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
> …
> > Test-Runs:
> > Each hypervisor had only the one bench-guest running, no other
> > tasks/g
Am 22.10.2018 um 13:26 schrieb Harry Schmalzbauer:
…
Test-Runs:
Each hypervisor had only the one bench-guest running, no other
tasks/guests were running besides system's native standard processes.
Since the time between powering up the guest and finishing logon
differed notably (~5s vs. ~20s) f
10 matches
Mail list logo
