>
> On 3/30/19 2:37 PM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >> On 3/30/19 1:08 AM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >>>
> >>> So it is a edk2 implementation, and can you point me at
> >>> the bhyve version of it? The Qemu/KVM version is rather
> >>> not relavent to this discussion as that would not work due
> >>>
On 3/30/19 2:37 PM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
On 3/30/19 1:08 AM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
So it is a edk2 implementation, and can you point me at
the bhyve version of it? The Qemu/KVM version is rather
not relavent to this discussion as that would not work due
to core vmm implementation differ
> On 3/30/19 1:08 AM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >
> > I do not know what the above is, could you elaborate for me?
> > What is OVMF and what is its relation to bhyve?
>
>
> OVMF is the Open Virtual Machine Firmware: it's open source (BSD
> licensed) firmware for virtual machines. Currently, that
On 3/30/19 1:08 AM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
I do not know what the above is, could you elaborate for me?
What is OVMF and what is its relation to bhyve?
OVMF is the Open Virtual Machine Firmware: it's open source (BSD
licensed) firmware for virtual machines. Currently, that means Qemu/KVM.
On 3/29/19 2:08 PM, Rebecca Cran via freebsd-virtualization wrote:
I ran the SCT 2.6 against the updated Bhyve firmware and uploaded the
results to https://bluestop.org/files/Summary.log .
I'm not sure how the failures compare with either the current firmware
or OVMF though, so I'm not sure
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 4:14 PM Rodney W. Grimes <
freebsd-...@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net wrote:
> > On 3/29/19 9:29 PM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > >
> > > That, iirc, would be the SMBIOS version of ed2k, which yes should
> > > be updated if infact the newer ed2k has a new SBIOS implementation,
> > > if it
> On 3/29/19 9:29 PM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >
> > That, iirc, would be the SMBIOS version of ed2k, which yes should
> > be updated if infact the newer ed2k has a new SBIOS implementation,
> > if it is still 1.00 implementaton then this needs to be left
> > alone.
>
>
> Under OVMF "smbiosview
On 3/29/19 9:29 PM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
That, iirc, would be the SMBIOS version of ed2k, which yes should
be updated if infact the newer ed2k has a new SBIOS implementation,
if it is still 1.00 implementaton then this needs to be left
alone.
Under OVMF "smbiosview -t 0" shows:
Vendor:
> On 3/25/19 3:59 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
> >
> > Yep, makes sense to me. For either of these changes we would want to get
> > test converage on basically all functionality, so might as well take
> > both changes at once.
>
>
> One thing I noticed is that the SMBIOS information claims it's BH
On 3/29/19 12:29 PM, Rebecca Cran via freebsd-virtualization wrote:
On 3/25/19 3:59 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
Yep, makes sense to me. For either of these changes we would want to get
test converage on basically all functionality, so might as well take
both changes at once.
One thing I noti
On 3/25/19 3:59 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
Yep, makes sense to me. For either of these changes we would want to get
test converage on basically all functionality, so might as well take
both changes at once.
One thing I noticed is that the SMBIOS information claims it's BHYVE
BIOS v1.00 rele
On 3/25/19 3:59 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
For either of these changes we would want to get
test converage on basically all functionality, so might as well take
both changes at once.
What testing are you thinking is needed at this point? I guess
installing and running FreeBSD, Linux and Win
Rebecca Cran writes:
> On 3/22/19 4:29 PM, Rebecca Cran via freebsd-virtualization wrote:
> > On 3/22/19 2:25 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm, I guess it might be some diference in the code generation
> > > between gcc 4.8 and gcc 5.
> >
> >
> > I've just tested switching from gcc 4.8 t
On 3/22/19 4:29 PM, Rebecca Cran via freebsd-virtualization wrote:
On 3/22/19 2:25 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
Hmm, I guess it might be some diference in the code generation between
gcc 4.8 and gcc 5.
I've just tested switching from gcc 4.8 to 8.3.0 and everything seems
to work fine - both
On 3/22/19 2:25 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
Hmm, I guess it might be some diference in the code generation between
gcc 4.8 and gcc 5.
I've just tested switching from gcc 4.8 to 8.3.0 and everything seems to
work fine - both build and runtime - so I think it may be more
productive to upgrade
Rebecca Cran writes:
> On 3/22/19 10:12 AM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
>
> >
> > You're seeing this firmware triple fault in the DEBUG build of this new
> > firmware? It seems to be functioning properly for me. Do you get any
> > serial output before the fault?
>
> I do get quite a bit of output bef
On 3/22/19 10:12 AM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
You're seeing this firmware triple fault in the DEBUG build of this new
firmware? It seems to be functioning properly for me. Do you get any
serial output before the fault?
I do get quite a bit of output before the fault. I'm running 13-CURRENT
(
rebe...@bluestop.org writes:
> On Mar 21, 2019, 9:54 PM -0600, Larry Rosenman , wrote:
> > out of curiosity, is there any work being done to move this to later
> > LLVM/CLANG?
>
> That’s something else I’m hoping to work on, since gcc 4.8 is very
> outdated now. It seems to build fine using gcc 7,
Marcelo Araujo writes:
> This is a fantastic news!!!
>
> I think after more tests done by the community, you should make a PR
> to this repo: https://github.com/freebsd/uefi-edk2 and then I can
> update the ports.
Yep, that sounds like a good plan to me. Is there anything else I can be
doing to
Rebecca Cran writes:
> This is awesome! Updating to a newer edk2 has been on my todo list for
> a while.
>
> However I don’t see a BhyvePkg in the first link you posted. And could
> you confirm that you got HTTP boot working on FreeBSD as well as Linux
> and Windows? I thought loader changes were
On Mar 21, 2019, 9:54 PM -0600, Larry Rosenman , wrote:
> out of curiosity, is there any work being done to move this to later
> LLVM/CLANG?
That’s something else I’m hoping to work on, since gcc 4.8 is very outdated
now. It seems to build fine using gcc 7, but I need to test that it still runs
On 03/21/2019 10:19 pm, Rebecca Cran via freebsd-virtualization wrote:
On 3/21/19 6:44 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
Hi freebsd-virtualization,
Recently I wanted to be able to do UEFI HTTP Boot in bhyve, so I've
rebased the bhyve firmware up to the latest upstream tag,
edk2-stable201903. You can
On 3/21/19 6:44 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
Hi freebsd-virtualization,
Recently I wanted to be able to do UEFI HTTP Boot in bhyve, so I've
rebased the bhyve firmware up to the latest upstream tag,
edk2-stable201903. You can find the firmware here:
https://gitlab.com/scott-ph/edk2/tree/wip/2019-
Em sex, 22 de mar de 2019 às 08:45, D Scott Phillips <
d.scott.phill...@intel.com> escreveu:
> Hi freebsd-virtualization,
>
> Recently I wanted to be able to do UEFI HTTP Boot in bhyve, so I've
> rebased the bhyve firmware up to the latest upstream tag,
> edk2-stable201903. You can find the firmwa
This is awesome! Updating to a newer edk2 has been on my todo list for a while.
However I don’t see a BhyvePkg in the first link you posted. And could you
confirm that you got HTTP boot working on FreeBSD as well as Linux and Windows?
I thought loader changes were needed for that to work, to ena
25 matches
Mail list logo
