-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/09/12 13:47, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 06:07:05 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> BAZ> On 9. Jul 2012, at 06:01 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 20:52:55 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>>
>>> BAZ> Situation
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 06:07:05 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
BAZ> On 9. Jul 2012, at 06:01 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 20:52:55 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>
>> BAZ> Situation 1)
>>
>> BAZ> epairNa is in base, eiparNb is jail foo
>> BAZ> stop jail foo:
On 9. Jul 2012, at 06:01 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 20:52:55 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> BAZ> Situation 1)
>
> BAZ> epairNa is in base, eiparNb is jail foo
> BAZ> stop jail foo: jail -r foo
> BAZ> both epairN[ab] will live in base and can be desti
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 20:52:55 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
BAZ> Situation 1)
BAZ> epairNa is in base, eiparNb is jail foo
BAZ> stop jail foo: jail -r foo
BAZ> both epairN[ab] will live in base and can be destiryed without
vnet switching
BAZ> Situation 2)
BAZ>
On 8. Jul 2012, at 20:40 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:38:23 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> BAZ> On 6. Jul 2012, at 05:53 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:21:53 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>>
>>> BAZ> On 5. Jul 2012, at 19:53 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:38:23 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
BAZ> On 6. Jul 2012, at 05:53 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:21:53 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>
>> BAZ> On 5. Jul 2012, at 19:53 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>>
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:18:20 -0700 Xin Li
On 6. Jul 2012, at 05:53 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:21:53 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> BAZ> On 5. Jul 2012, at 19:53 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:18:20 -0700 Xin Li wrote:
>>>
>>> XL> Hi, Mikolaj,
>>>
>>> XL> On 07/04/12 00:00, Mikolaj Gol
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 20:21:53 + Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
BAZ> On 5. Jul 2012, at 19:53 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:18:20 -0700 Xin Li wrote:
>>
>> XL> Hi, Mikolaj,
>>
>> XL> On 07/04/12 00:00, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
Is this observed after destroying epair? Th
On 5. Jul 2012, at 19:53 , Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:18:20 -0700 Xin Li wrote:
>
> XL> Hi, Mikolaj,
>
> XL> On 07/04/12 00:00, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>>> Is this observed after destroying epair? There is an issue with
>>> epair: on destroy, when epair_clone_destroy() calls
>
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:18:20 -0700 Xin Li wrote:
XL> Hi, Mikolaj,
XL> On 07/04/12 00:00, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>> Is this observed after destroying epair? There is an issue with
>> epair: on destroy, when epair_clone_destroy() calls
>> ether_ifdetach() for its second half it does not switch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi, Mikolaj,
On 07/04/12 00:00, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> Is this observed after destroying epair? There is an issue with
> epair: on destroy, when epair_clone_destroy() calls
> ether_ifdetach() for its second half it does not switch to its vnet
> and
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:45:40 -0700 Xin Li wrote:
XL> Hi,
XL> I've talked with bz@ briefly about this and we think it's better to
XL> put this to a mailing list.
XL> Here is what I have seen on 8.2-RELEASE (with a few local patches).
XL> When doing "jail -r ", after a while, a GPF happens
12 matches
Mail list logo