Marcelo Araujo wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> I think it is doable, my only concern is the complexity and
> maintainability, as along the way we will add more devices and would be
> nice to have something transparent for those additions or at least
> something easy to be extended.
Yeah, it's true, I t
Hi Roman,
I think it is doable, my only concern is the complexity and
maintainability, as along the way we will add more devices and would be
nice to have something transparent for those additions or at least
something easy to be extended.
As an example this patch that you made:
https://bugs.free
Bhyve evolves over time, and new features get added, such as new
devices support, new guest configurations and so on. However, it's not
really straight-forward to figure out what features a given bhyve binary
supports. This makes it harder to develop tools on top of bhyve,
specifically error report