On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> Has anyone used VALE with bhyve yet? It's in 10.0-RELEASE
> http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/vale/
>
>
Just a general question on virtual network how encapsulatable (ability to
wrap standardized wrappers around them) to do the different thing
Has anyone used VALE with bhyve yet? It's in 10.0-RELEASE
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/vale/
On 2/5/2014 5:57 AM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
Thank you :)
With crossbow, no GUI too.
I always prefer cmd line thant gui :p
Thank you for the document. Actually, i am testing the vde2 port (
http://www.
Thank you :)
With crossbow, no GUI too.
I always prefer cmd line thant gui :p
Thank you for the document. Actually, i am testing the vde2 port (
http://www.freebsdports.info/ports/net/vde2.html).
It's very interesting too for build a virtual network.
--
fax
2014-02-05 Craig Rodrigues :
> On Sa
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Frédéric Alix >wrote:
>
> > Now, i need a tool for build a virtual network, like crossbow in Illumos.
> >
>
> Well, it is not a graphical tool, but if
> you are OK with doing things from the command-line,
>
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
> Now, i need a tool for build a virtual network, like crossbow in Illumos.
>
Well, it is not a graphical tool, but if
you are OK with doing things from the command-line,
you can create a bridge network device and create
tap interfaces for each
Just an example of this then I will be quiet and take my frustration out on
inanimate objects which what kind of hair brained unix like OS would not
come with a working C compiler (ubuntu does not come with one)
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> I forgot how frustrating Lin
I forgot how frustrating Linux can be (FB really spoils you) until just
today when I started to really play with it for petitecloud development
reasons instead of making "cute toys" like the how to install DevStack
tutorial
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
> Yes, i saw this t
Yes, i saw this two days ago. I read it and take many notes.
2014-02-01 Aryeh Friedman :
> Just a small tip if your new to FreeBSD you might surprised that 90% of
> the real action happens in mailling lists not web based things. Namely
> -virtualization@ is likely your best long term resource
Just a small tip if your new to FreeBSD you might surprised that 90% of the
real action happens in mailling lists not web based things. Namely
-virtualization@ is likely your best long term resource as you learn.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
> | I am also looking into t
Oh super !
Thx !!! \o/
2014-02-01 Julian Elischer :
> On 2/1/14, 6:44 PM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
>
>> | I am also looking into this but I think you will find the FB has almost
>> everything you need right out of the box
>>
>> yes, you should right. I am reading the FB handbook and many blogs for
On 2/1/14, 6:44 PM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
| I am also looking into this but I think you will find the FB has almost
everything you need right out of the box
yes, you should right. I am reading the FB handbook and many blogs for
learn how run *BSD
After 13 years in Solaris world, it's a big change
I very like bhyve and the new iSCSI seem to be great too.
>
The fact that bhyve does not attempt to manage the iSCSI directly is a real
win here IMO for example see
http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/content/ch_introduction-to-openstack-compute.html#section_nova-disaster-recovery-processf
| I am also looking into this but I think you will find the FB has almost
everything you need right out of the box
yes, you should right. I am reading the FB handbook and many blogs for
learn how run *BSD
After 13 years in Solaris world, it's a big change to me.
I very like bhyve and the new iSCSI
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Frédéric Alix wrote:
> Few minutes ago i read this:
>
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2013-10-2013-12.html#FreeBSD-Host-Support-for-OpenStack-and-OpenContrail
>
> Hum... OpenContrail port .. :p
> I am not interesting by OpenStack but OpenContrail, of c
Few minutes ago i read this:
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2013-10-2013-12.html#FreeBSD-Host-Support-for-OpenStack-and-OpenContrail
Hum... OpenContrail port .. :p
I am not interesting by OpenStack but OpenContrail, of course !
After a little search, i found this:
http://opencontr
Hello Frederic,
This is an interesting question. Funny thing is in the past day I had the same
doubt, but after some minutes I realized FreeBSD already has everything that is
needed to handle a "virtualization network" by itself. Obviously what's missing
is some kind of GUI or guided path to do
Hi !
I am learning how use bhyve and actullay, it's a real pleasure to use it :-)
I would like build a virtual infra in a box. Many bhyve vm for each
services. Firewalls, routers, dns, app serv, databases serv, ...
For this, bhyve is just perfect.
Now, i need a tool for build a virtual network, li
17 matches
Mail list logo
