Re: Why is it that when I run FreeBSD in a local KVM, it behaves normal, but when it run it in our OpenStack cloud, IO is painfully slow?

Am 2020-10-26 17:25, schrieb rai...@ultra-secure.de: Hi, I uploaded the qcow2 image of 12.2RC3 and a recent 13-snapshot to our Openstack Cloud. I use dc3dd wipe to test IO because it eliminates the filesystem. I don't really have a particular fast SSD in my office PC, but I get around 100MB/s

Why is it that when I run FreeBSD in a local KVM, it behaves normal, but when it run it in our OpenStack cloud, IO is painfully slow?

Hi, I uploaded the qcow2 image of 12.2RC3 and a recent 13-snapshot to our Openstack Cloud. I use dc3dd wipe to test IO because it eliminates the filesystem. I don't really have a particular fast SSD in my office PC, but I get around 100MB/s from writing zeros to the harddisk in CentOS. I al

Re: vmware/vmx causing problems

Am 2020-08-10 09:03, schrieb Daniel Braniss: On 10 Aug 2020, at 09:46, Rainer Duffner wrote: Am 10.08.2020 um 07:27 schrieb Daniel Braniss : hi, suspend/resume/migrate works fine up to 11.3, in 12.1 it usually becomes very unresponsive, ping can take several minutes after a suspend

Re: vmware/vmx causing problems

> Am 10.08.2020 um 07:27 schrieb Daniel Braniss : > > hi, > suspend/resume/migrate works fine up to 11.3, > in 12.1 it usually becomes very unresponsive, ping can take several minutes > after a suspend/migrate. > switching to em works fine. > > any ideas on how to save this? > You need to

Re: The status of docker

> Am 20.01.2019 um 11:53 schrieb Grzegorz Junka : > > I did use bhyve with CentOS in another project but that approach wouldn't > quite work in this situation as for my understanding, unless you propose that > I run docker on a Linux distribution running in bhyve? Yes, that would be the out

Re: The status of docker

> Am 19.01.2019 um 15:24 schrieb Grzegorz Junka : > > Has this project been completed and now only needs testing, or has it been > abandoned, or maybe the approach has changed and I am looking in a wrong > place? AFAIK, it’s dead. Docker is a Linux-thing. Your best bet is to run Linux in

Question about bhyve

- because each one would need different routing than the other. - the VMs would be file-servers that export a NFS share - can I get more than 1GB/s in the VMs? Thanks. Rainer ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org

Re: OpenStack on FreeBSD

> Am 23.08.2016 um 18:58 schrieb Pete Wright : > > In light of this I reckon there is room for an alternative to OpenStack in > the market...hopefully one based on a cleaner implementation :) AFAIK, it’s called Apache CloudStack. ___ freebsd-virtu

Re: Running FreeBSD docker images on non-FreeBSD hosts

> Am 02.06.2016 um 22:50 schrieb Jeff Terrell : > > > That said, if one did create such a monstrosity as a docker image > containing a KVM hypervisor containing a FreeBSD VM A guy at work ran a chef-server on Ubuntu in a headless VirtualBox in a Solaris 10 Zone. He really liked Solaris. _

Question about bhyve disk images

Hi, is it possible to increase the size of these images (after creation, and while the guest OS is running)? How large can they be? I may have a use-case where I would need to have images in the size of tens of terabytes. Or is there a way to delegate a ZFS (or a pool) to a bhyve guest?