Re: tap on lagg ?

Hi, So all in all, I added « -vlanhwtag -txcsum -txcsum6 » on all 4 igb interfaces. They still all put themselves in promiscuous mode, however. But TCPing the host from a VM now works. Please find the relevant dmesg and ifconfig output below. But I’d still appreciate more background information

Re: tap on lagg ?

Hello, Sorry for waiting so long. I don’t know if i’m doing it right but I tried « -vlanhwtag » all the interfaces and I’m still having problems. Namely (as I didn’t have this information before) that all participating interfaces in the bridge itself are in promiscuous mode (and, if that is re

Re: tap on lagg ?

>> I have multiple machines on which 2 or more nics make up a LACP lagg >> with vlans on it. Those vlan interfaces are in bridges together with the >> tap interfaces that are in use by bhyve vms. >> >> Works as long as I "up" the nics in a specific fasion ( " -tso4 -lro >> -vlanhwtag " ) . This wo

Re: tap on lagg ?

Hi Ruben, Thanks for this. > Le 6 févr. 2017 à 17:14, Ruben a écrit : > > Hi Vincent, > > I have multiple machines on which 2 or more nics make up a LACP lagg > with vlans on it. Those vlan interfaces are in bridges together with the > tap interfaces that are in use by bhyve vms. > > Works as

Re: tap on lagg ?

BTW, I found this a couple of weeks ago and it has just been updated: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157182 <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157182> > Le 6 févr. 2017 à 11:11, Vincent Olivier a écrit : > > Hi, > > Has anyone succee

Re: Ubuntu UEFI Won't Reboot

which I can select Ubuntu, which in turn boots the OS just fine. Now, the question is, can I configure bhyve to look for that file instead of whatever it is currently looking for and not finding? Or do I have to modify the ESP? > Le 6 févr. 2017 à 11:27, Vincent Olivier a écrit : >

Ubuntu UEFI Won't Reboot

Hi, I can install Ubuntu (Server LTS 16.04.1) in graphic UEFI mode with the official ISO install media. But when I restart the machine without the install media, I get: Boot Failed. EFI DVD/CDROM Boot Failed. EFI Misc Device I’m sure there is an easy modification to a plain text file in the /b

tap on lagg ?

Hi, Has anyone succeeded in having a bhyve VM tap interface on an aggregate interface (lagg)? From what I have read until now, it seems to be a known problem, and my experience shows that it is still an issue with FreeBSD 11, so I would like to know if it is because tap/bridging a lagg is not a

Re: Thanks

> Le 5 févr. 2017 à 13:33, Trent Thompson a écrit : > > Vincent, > > >have my macOS built-in VNC client working with bhyve (right now, only > >TigerVNC works) > > If I recall, this is due to null authentication from bhyve fbuf. There does > seem to be a patch in phabricator to add simple au

Thanks

Hi, I just wanted to say that after a couple of months running different configurations of various OSes, I am extremely pleased with bhyve. It’s one of the good things in my life right now! So thanks to the authors and the users here who helped me along the way. The next steps for me are: get

Re: Arch Linux UEFI Bhyve Setup

Hi Peter, It works! Thanks so much to everyone who helped me! I will see about the stability of this thing in the next few days. If it is as stable as the MBR/GRUB VMs, I will redo them all. Regards, Vincent > Le 9 janv. 2017 à 01:28, Peter Grehan a écrit : > > Hi Vincent, > >> Nothing

Re: Arch Linux UEFI Bhyve Setup

idea I can try… Thanks for everything. Vincent > On Jan 2, 2017, at 9:18 PM, Vincent Olivier wrote: > > Hi Peter! Thanks for this. I’m going to look at how to rebuild an Archlinux > ISO with that extra option later this week and see how it goes. Regards, > > Vincent > &g

Initramfs unpacking failed: junk in compressed archive

Hello, I want to try the Alpine Linux “VIRTUAL” ISO because it seems everybody is going this way nowadays: https://fr.alpinelinux.org/alpine/v3.5/releases/x86_64/alpine-virt-3.5.0-x86_64.iso I’m using the “vm-bhyve” scripts and based on the “alpine.conf” template here: https://github.com/churc

Re: Arch Linux UEFI Bhyve Setup

Hi Peter! Thanks for this. I’m going to look at how to rebuild an Archlinux ISO with that extra option later this week and see how it goes. Regards, Vincent > Le 2 janv. 2017 à 15:52, Peter Grehan a écrit : > > Hi Vincent, > >> I guess my resolution for 2017 is more clarity. >> >> So what I

Re: Arch Linux UEFI Bhyve Setup

about using UEFI over serial console, I will stick to GRUB but if someone coule elaborate on this, I would appreciate it greatly! Thanks, Vincent > On Dec 31, 2016, at 9:26 AM, Vincent Olivier wrote: > > Hi, > > A new thread for this same target setup: > https://twitt

Arch Linux UEFI Bhyve Setup

Hi, A new thread for this same target setup: https://twitter.com/MUP4/status/814595352112283649 Please note that the tap interface naming doesn’t follow the nomenclature in the diagram as I am just testing isolated aspect of the setup for now. The « Cinq » FreeBSD 11 machine already the ALTNET

Re: Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

Hi! I made a little diagram of the situation that I posted of Twitter. If you are aggressive enough with the web interface you can see a full size version where the labels are clear enough to read. https://twitter.com/MUP4/status/814595352112283649 I had fun doing it. Hope it provides a little

Re: Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

Hi! > Use the same bridge but a different tap (each tap represents the virtual > equivalent of a NIC where the bridge is the virtual equivalent of a hub) Thanks! This is very clear. For extra isolation, could I use a new bridge too or is that useless? Thanks! Vincent ___

Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

Hi, I have my first arch linux virtual machine running fine on FreeBSD 11. Now I want to make another one. Should I create a new bridge? A new tap too? It is not clear from the documentation if these steps are required for multiple guests on a single host… Thanks! Happy Holidays, Vincent si