On 12/20/2015 09:15 AM, Peter Ross wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I read through an older threat I kept in my archive. It started like this:
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Udo Rader wrote:
>
>> As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four
>> hypervisors:
&g
On 04/01/2015 01:43 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Bhyve only supports raw disk images.. I'ts quite early in it's
> developement life so some features may not
> be present yet.
thanks for your insights.
what you write about bhyve sounds quite good, so I'll give that a try as
well.
Raw disks are fi
On 04/01/2015 12:41 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 01/04/15 a les 12.30, Udo Rader ha escrit:
>> As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors:
>>
>> * bhyve
>> * KVM
>> * QEMU
>> * VirtualBox
>
> Make that 5:
&g
Hi all,
first please excuse if this may be a FAQ, but even though I am a long
time linux admin (~1996), I am quite new to the *BSD world and I am
trying to evaluate if FreeBSD fits our virtualization needs.
So, for my many questions:
As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four
