When will vbox 6.X have a working port?

I have tried every patch I can find in bug.freebsd.org for 6.0.12 and 6.1X they all fail to compile and/or mess my graphics up even more than 5.2 (with all it's really strange rendering). So when is the port going to be usable by mere mortals? -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.Pe

Re: AMD-V is being used by another hypervisor (VERR_SVM_IN_USE).

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 5:57 PM Brandon helsley wrote: > I am trying to start virtualbox but every time I try to load the iso the > GUI displays that another VM is running and that I need to stop it to start > virtualbox. > Are you using bhyve or qemu in another process? -- Aryeh M. Friedman,

Re: Booting multi user mode in bhyve

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 3:17 PM Brandon helsley wrote: > Which sysctl do you use, I didn't see it above. I will send you kldstat > sysctl net.link.tap.up_on_open=1 ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li

Re: Booting multi user mode in bhyve

On some motherboards and AMD processors you need to load the modules at boot time (bug?) for example on my MSI B450 Tomahawk w/ a Ryzen 5 2600x it refused to work unless I put the kernel modules in /boot/loader.conf and the above sysctl into /etc/sysctl.conf. What is the output of kldstat? On Sun

Re: Booting multi user mode in bhyve

https://aka.ms/blhgte> > > ------ > *From:* Aryeh Friedman > *Sent:* Sunday, May 24, 2020 11:53:40 AM > *To:* Brandon helsley > *Cc:* freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org < > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> > *Subject:* Re: Booting multi

Re: Booting multi user mode in bhyve

It sounds like you made no tap interface even if the kernel module is loaded what does ifconfig -a say? On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 1:33 PM Brandon helsley wrote: > I followed the handbook exactly and when trying to boot multi user the > exact error message is "loading configured modules... Can't f

Re: Booting multi user mode in bhyve

------- > *From:* Aryeh Friedman > *Sent:* Sunday, May 24, 2020 1:23:33 AM > *To:* Brandon helsley > *Cc:* freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org < > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> > *Subject:* Re: Booting multi user mode in bhyve > > Are the vmm, if_tap, if_

Re: Booting multi user mode in bhyve

Are the vmm, if_tap, if_bridge and nmdm kernel modules loaded? On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 12:56 AM Brandon helsley < brandon.hels...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I'm trying to boot multi user in bhyve and it says "loading configured > modules... Can't find /boot/entropy open of /dev/tap0 failed device > em

Re: Bhyve iso

layer higher level cloud computing services on. > > Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/blhgte> > ------ > *From:* Aryeh Friedman > *Sent:* Monday, May 11, 2020 9:13:12 AM > *To:* Brandon helsley > *Cc:* freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org <

Re: Bhyve iso

lid/routable connection 3. Run bhyve 4. Do any additional book keeping needed to allow PetiteCloud (the program that generated the script) to manage the VM instance from it's web interface > Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/blhgte> > -- > *From:*

Re: Bhyve iso

w=800,h=600 -s 30,xhci,tablet -s 31,lpc -l com1,/dev/nmdm6B -l bootrom,/usr/local/share/uefi-firmware/BHYVE_UEFI.fd adda5345720edee1&>/dev/null echo $!>/var/run/petitecloud/adda5345720edee1 sleep 10 > > Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/blhgte> > -

Re: Bhyve iso

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 9:26 AM Brandon helsley wrote: > In setting up bhyve today, or at least learning how, and I'm stuck at the > part after I create with truncate the device map image. I'm supposed to put > an iso with the devicemap.img and then boot from grub. How do I complete > this last s

Re: Bhyve help

llow you to configure > networking so that they can be downloaded from the internet." This happens > after system components. > > Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/blhgte> > -- > *From:* Aryeh Friedman > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 5, 202

Re: Bhyve help

> system.common console types are: ansi, vt100, xterm, cons25w. > > Console type [vt100]: > > Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/blhgte> > -- > *From:* Aryeh Friedman > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 5, 2020 3:52:26 AM > *To:* Brandon helsley

Re: Bhyve help

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:21 AM Brandon helsley wrote: > I have re0 but the ip address is under wlan0 with my CenturyLink > In order to use vtnet and bridging (both required for bhyve networking) you need to load the load the virtio kernel module as well as the if_tap and vmm modules (the first o

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

ging the list at > > >> freebsd-virtualization-ow...@freebsd.org > > >> > > >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > >> than "Re: Cont

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 3:26 PM Anish wrote: > [Resending without screenshot to reduce message size] > > Hi Christian, > > This looks like BIOS issue, BIOS must not set Bit4/SVMDIS in VM_CR MSR > It is likely not a BIOS issue per se because I have a near identical setup and the BIOS (AMI) set st

Re: bhyve with AMD Ryzen 3900X and MSI MEG ACE X570

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 4:57 AM Christian Jeannot wrote: > Hi Community, > > I am testing bhyve from FreeBSD 12.1 RELEASE. > > My environment: > - CPU: AMD Ryze 3900X > - Mainboard: MSI MEG ACE X570, Default settings, latest BIOS 7C35v18 > - RAM: G.Skill RipJaws V DIMM Kit 64GB, DDR4-3200, CL16-1

Re: Running dual boot windows inside of bhyve

e blown up in testing and the other is a copy of the OS we are having browser/client issues with at the moment). > The first thing you need to do is copy the partition to another drive. > Impractical since all bays are used. > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Aryeh Friedman > w

Running dual boot windows inside of bhyve

Cross posted to virtualization@, hackers@ and questions. I have a dual boot machine (windows 7 64 bit and fbsd 11.1-RELEASE [amd64]) and want to run the windows partition as a vm in bhyve how would I go about this. Bonus if the process is standalone scriptable so I can add it as a feature of Pet

VBox freezes on 11.0-RELEASE on a AMD processor

When I run vbox with windows 10 (install CD) and allocate 2 cores/4 GB (out of 4 cores and 8 GB) it runs fine until some other non-trivial task (like java or libreoffice) starts and then both vbox and the new task lock up (a hard reboot is needed) -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.

Re: Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Vincent Olivier wrote: > Hi! > > > Use the same bridge but a different tap (each tap represents the virtual > equivalent of a NIC where the bridge is the virtual equivalent of a hub) > > > Thanks! This is very clear. For extra isolation, could I use a new bridge

Re: Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Vincent Olivier wrote: > Hi, > > I have my first arch linux virtual machine running fine on FreeBSD 11. Now > I want to make another one. Should I create a new bridge? A new tap too? It > is not clear from the documentation if these steps are required for > multip

11-STABLE guest under bhyve is unstable on a 11-STABLE host

After a month or so of experimenting with running 11-STABLE guests on a 11-STABLE host (upgraded from 10.3 host and guests) I have found that the guests crash/freeze for no apparent reason (leaving no kernel panic log). But if I do 10.3 guests on the 11-STABLE host it is very stable. -- Aryeh M.

Re: svm/amd-v not working after upgrade from 10.3 to 11

EFER.SVME is 1 generates a #GP fault, regardless of the current state >of VM_CR.LOCK. This bit is not affected by SKINIT. It is cleared by INIT >when LOCK is cleared to 0; otherwise, it is not affected. > > -Anish > On 10/25/16 7:37 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > > On Tue,

Re: svm/amd-v not working after upgrade from 10.3 to 11

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > > The file /var/run/dmesg.boot will have a copy of dmesg from when the > machine booted. > > It was even smaller then normal dmesg output here is the file: root@lilith:/usr/src # more /var/run/dmesg.boot uhub7: 4 ports with 4 removable, self

Re: svm/amd-v not working after upgrade from 10.3 to 11

from my iPhone > > > On Oct 24, 2016, at 9:00 PM, Aryeh Friedman > wrote: > > > > After I did a clean install of 11 on a machine, HP Pavilion p7-1234, that > > used to have 10.3 on it vmm and virtualbox both claim that svm/amd-v are > > turned off in the BIOS.

svm/amd-v not working after upgrade from 10.3 to 11

After I did a clean install of 11 on a machine, HP Pavilion p7-1234, that used to have 10.3 on it vmm and virtualbox both claim that svm/amd-v are turned off in the BIOS. The BIOS has no settings for virtualization (and no BIOS upgrades are available from HP). How do I force svm/amd-v to be used

does FreeBSD 10.3 bhyve support windows guests?

Or is this support only in -CURRENT? -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to

bhyve not working on a machine it used to work on

I had to reinstall the OS on a AMD machine that had bhyve running under 11-CURRENT just fine but when I reinstalled I got "device not configured" on bhyveload do I need revert to r273375

Re: odd output from bhyve

PetiteCloud generated it I took it off for debugging reasons (same error with or without) On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2015-04-04 15:04, Aryeh Friedman wrote: >> FreeBSD prometheus 10.1-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p8 #0 r281026: >> Fri Apr 3 14

Re: odd output from bhyve

, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2015-04-04 12:55, Aryeh Friedman wrote: >> /tmp/bhyve.WwKTaeP 84: Name (PPRT, Package () >>Remark 2095 - >> Effectiv

odd output from bhyve

/tmp/bhyve.WwKTaeP 84: Name (PPRT, Package () Remark 2095 - Effective AML package length is zero ^ vm_run error -1, errno 6 -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org

Re: bhyve VM crashed

What was the guest OS? On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Steve Wills wrote: > Hi, > > I experienced a bhyve VM crash with this message: > > vm exit[1] > reason VMX > rip 0x80c7490b > inst_length 3 > status 0 > exit_

Re: Clock in bhyve

Yes there is always a time drift on a guest/instance... in specialized cases it makes sense to modify the instance by requiring it run ntpd but if it is general purpose and for general "public" (whatever that means in your context) instances it is likely to turn people away to know that they ar

Re: bhyve + OpenStack

We have DevStack running under bhyve on PetiteCloud [ http://www.petitecloud.org ] and once we do a little bit more debugging of our API we will test a complete ground up install (with docs)... from my experience with both DevStack and a full OpenStack install (manually on a bare metal linux host {

Call for Submissions: 1st Creative use of Cloud Computing Contest

http://www.petitecloud.org/contest.jsp -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to

petitecloud 0.2.6 released

Whats new: * API (with command line) * Hooks for micro pligins http://www.petitecloud.org -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr

Re: correctly putting all bhyve vm's on the same internal networtk

Forgot that net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > Setting up a ineternal network on the bridge nic seems to now allow guests > to communicate (see below for failed attempt transcript) > > root@lilith:/tmp # ifconfig bridge0 192.168.0.1 >

correctly putting all bhyve vm's on the same internal networtk

Setting up a ineternal network on the bridge nic seems to now allow guests to communicate (see below for failed attempt transcript) root@lilith:/tmp # ifconfig bridge0 192.168.0.1 ... Install an instance and put it on 192.168.0.2 ... Host: root@lilith:/tmp # netstat -nr Routing tables Internet:

Re: Bhyve and Ubuntu booting

> And I've seen discussions in other threads about reading/writing cpu > registers where some bits should be 0, but trap when being set > (Or something close to this...???) > > So it could again be due to the amdsrc tree differences? > > --WjW > > And again this is running on my AMD-board. > /d

Re: Bhyve and booting a ZFS-on-root system

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Feb 23, 2014 2:59 AM, "Willem Jan Withagen" wrote: > > > > > > > > Op 22 feb. 2014 om 22:28 heeft Craig Rodrigues het > volgende geschreven: > > > >> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Willem Jan Withagen > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>>

Re: Bhyve and booting a ZFS-on-root system

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Willem Jan Withagen >wrote: > > > > > CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1075T Processor (3013.84-MHz K8-class CPU) > > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x100fa0 Family = 0x10 Model = 0xa > > > > Also, as Aryeh ha

Re: Bhyve and booting a ZFS-on-root system

You need a special branch of bhyve to work on AMD (see recent thread on the topic) On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Hi, > > Just for the fun of it, I tried my build zfs-system scripts in a bhyve-vm. > > I use the 10.0-RELEASE iso to get to a shell, config and interfa

Re: CFT: bhyve AMD snapshot

...vm1 > bhyve.vm1 > ... > bhyvectl --destroy --vm=vm1 << > bhyveload ...vm1 > bhyve.vm1 > > > Thanks for your help in testing bhyve_svm and bhyve. > > -Anish > > On Feb 17, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Aryeh Friedman > wrote: > > > Sorry for t

Re: Fwd: CFT: bhyve AMD snapshot

Sorry for taking so long (forgot to say orginally this is the guest) On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Peter Grehan wrote: > Hi Aryeh, > > kernel panic during boot >> > > Can you post a verbose boot log with the panic (i.e. "boot -v" from the > loader prompt) ?OK boot -v > Booting... > SMAP t

Re: emulators/petitecloud 0.2.1 available

; Any help is appreciated. > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Aryeh Friedman > wrote: > >> > This is correct behavior since there are no long lived processes all >> > running the rc.d does is do some quick system wide inits needed to run >> vm's >

Re: Detect of BHyve VM was powered off or rebooted?

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Peter Grehan wrote: > No - leave them there. Think of the tap interfaces as ports on a switch, > and the bhyve processes as being plugged/unplugged from the ports. > Every time I have tried this it has lead to bricking the bridge if done in the wrong order and/

Re: Fwd: CFT: bhyve AMD snapshot

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Peter Grehan wrote: > Hi Aryeh, > > >root@:/home/aryeh # uname -a >> >>> FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r261732: Tue Feb 11 03:19:01 EST 2014 aryeh@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >>> This isn't the revision of the

Re: Detect of BHyve VM was powered off or rebooted?

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Neel Natu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One question, if "bhyve" exits, do I have to call bhyveload again > before > > > calling bhyve? > > > > Yes, that is correct. You will also need to destroy the

PetiteCloud 0.2.5 released

What's new: * Ability to use physical disks as backing stores * Multiple NIC's * Multiple backing stores (1 primary and upto 5 secondary) * Advanced settings -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org

Fwd: CFT: bhyve AMD snapshot

-- Forwarded message -- From: Aryeh Friedman Date: Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:04 PM Subject: Re: CFT: bhyve AMD snapshot To: Peter Grehan root@:/home/aryeh # uname -a >> FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r261732: Tue Feb 11 03:19:01 >> EST 2014 aryeh@:

Re: CFT: bhyve AMD snapshot

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Michael Dexter wrote: > > I opted to build world with -j4 and kernel on -j2 on a dual-core system > as per Glen Barber's suggestion of how he is building the official > releases. What, if anything, do the parameters to "make world" have to do with ***VIRTUALIZATI

reminder to PetiteCloud users

Please ask all issues related to PetiteCloud on our mailing list (on the site) -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtual

CFT: PetiteCloud 0.2.5

Whats new: * Ability to use physical disks as backing stores * Multiple NIC's * Advanced settings -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lis

Re: CFT: bhyve AMD snapshot

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > It seems like the patch fails to acquire a DHCP address (or use the net in > any other way with the following which works fine on intel): > > #!/bin/sh > # > # Generated by PetiteCloud 0.2.5 > # > > truncat

Re: CFT: bhyve AMD snapshot

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Michael Dexter > wrote: > >> >> Willem, >> >> On 2/10/14 7:14 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: >> > I usually prefer to build my onw. So I tried that

Re: CFT: bhyve AMD snapshot

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Michael Dexter wrote: > > Willem, > > On 2/10/14 7:14 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > > I usually prefer to build my onw. So I tried that from a both basic > > 10-stable as well as the svn-url I got from Peter some time ago. But > > - building 10-stable did not gi

Re: Detect of BHyve VM was powered off or rebooted?

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Aryeh Friedman > wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I posted some

Re: Detect of BHyve VM was powered off or rebooted?

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Hi, > > I posted some rc.d scripts that I am using to boot a BHyve VM > and send the output to a serial console using the /dev/nmdm > driver: > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/2014-January/002040.html > > It wo

are ahci-hd images the same as raw under bhyve

When I was playing with bhyve-grub a while ago I noticed there seemed to be little difference between ahci-hd and "raw" (if no format it given besides just naming a md file). Is it safe to treat the two formats interchangeably in bhyve (and bhyve-grub)? Can I do this to the point of mixing and ma

Re: Report of my virtual network lab migrated from virtualbox to bhyve

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Aryeh Friedman >> wrote: >> >>> >>> It sounds almost identical to the qcow2

Re: Report of my virtual network lab migrated from virtualbox to bhyve

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Aryeh Friedman > wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Aryeh F

Re: Report of my virtual network lab migrated from virtualbox to bhyve

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Aryeh Friedman > wrote: > >> >> It sounds almost identical to the qcow2 security issue being discussed on >> qemu-de...@qemu.org recently. This might be a *HUGE* win for bhy

Re: Report of my virtual network lab migrated from virtualbox to bhyve

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Aryeh Friedman > wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:51

Re: Report of my virtual network lab migrated from virtualbox to bhyve

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Aryeh Friedman >> wrote: >>> >>> bhyve blindly read/writes into the middle of the

Re: Report of my virtual network lab migrated from virtualbox to bhyve

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Aryeh Friedman > wrote: >> >> bhyve blindly read/writes into the middle of the file without consulting >> the filesystem and thus bypassing any things like sparse fill in

Re: Report of my virtual network lab migrated from virtualbox to bhyve

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Aryeh Friedman > wrote: >> >> bhyve (as far I know) disks must be one solid file (md backed) or a /dev >> block device... therefore it is unlikely the above would work >&g

Re: Report of my virtual network lab migrated from virtualbox to bhyve

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé >wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Peter Grehan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > If you create a sparse file for the bhyve raw disk (e.g. with truncate > > > -s), du will show t

Re: Report of my virtual network lab migrated from virtualbox to bhyve

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Peter Grehan wrote: > > > > > > > If you create a sparse file for the bhyve raw disk (e.g. with truncate > > -s), du will show the actual blocks used rather than the total size. > > > But can I truncat

NOTICE to all PetiteCloud users

We have moved all support over to internal mailing lists. Please http://lists.petitecloud.nyclocal.net/listinfo.cgi to subscribe -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http:

Re: CFT: Very rough draft of PetiteCloud 0.2.4 (Linux as a host)

se. The NDA request was NOT posted on the -virtualization@ list; that was in a private email from Aryeh Friedman to Peter Grehan and him alone, way back in early August 2013. Peter immediately rejected all private communication and directed Aryeh to post everything to the -virtualization@ lis

Re: CFT: Very rough draft of PetiteCloud 0.2.4 (Linux as a host)

On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Kurt Lidl wrote: >1. We'll be creating our own mailing list as soon as we can solve these >> >>technical issues: >> >>a. Mailman (under apache22) seems to insist on being on port >> 80. >> We have no machine that is on the public internet that

Re: CFT: Very rough draft of PetiteCloud 0.2.4 (Linux as a host)

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:00 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 09:55:13 AM Michael Dexter wrote: > > May I suggest you take this all to a personal blog? > > I agree. You can use a blog on petitecloud.org if you wish, but the > purpose > of this list is discussing virtualizat

Re: Bhyve and network virtualization

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Kevin Bowling wrote: > Has anyone used VALE with bhyve yet? It's in 10.0-RELEASE > http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/vale/ > > Just a general question on virtual network how encapsulatable (ability to wrap standardized wrappers around them) to do the different thing

Re: Bhyve and network virtualization

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Frédéric Alix >wrote: > > > Now, i need a tool for build a virtual network, like crossbow in Illumos. > > > > Well, it is not a graphical tool, but if > you are OK with doing things from the command-line, >

Re: some interesting observations on the relative performance of kvm vs. bhyve

Note on cachemodes it seems to make very little real world difference in which one you pick. -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/

Fwd: using -virtualization@ as the preferred support channel for petitecloud?

clude more then just petitecloud -- Forwarded message ------ From: Aryeh Friedman Date: Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:08 PM Subject: Re: using -virtualization@ as the preferred support channel for petitecloud? To: Kevin Bowling We currently do not have enough demand for it (the actual te

Re: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org

By now we have made enough progress in runninng FB as a VM on FB why are we still putting out devlopement instances for various providers. Wouldn't it be easier to just put the raw disk images up (as far I know these will work with all frontend/hyperv [vmrun, petitecloud, raw hyperv calls, etc.] e

OT: How best to market FreeBSD's innate strengths as a cloud host?

After dealing with linux for the last few days the difference between it and FreeBSD are glaring when it comes to suitability as a cloud the host OS of a cloud node/host. Most of these strengths come from it's fundimentally sound design and design process. Namely it is rock solid because it was

CFT: Very rough draft of PetiteCloud 0.2.4 (Linux as a host)

Even though FreeBSD will always be my preferred OS for both personal and professional use it is sad to say in today's world if you do not support Linux and your run on Unix-like OS's then to everyone out side [insert favorite OS here] you don't exist. This is even more so for a effort like Petite

looking for a quick and dirty remote vnc solution

Use case: 1. I am out of the office (the entire office except for one petitelcoud instance is behind a firewall) without any ability to poke holes (something petitecloud will handle soon) 2. The way to install a non-bhyve hyperv instance (kvm in this case) 3. I am installing an QEMU instance (co

RFC: hyperv disk i/o performance vs. data integrity

Disclaimer: This is more of a thinking out loud then it is an definative set of suggestions on the matter. Also a cleaned up version of this will likely become PetiteCloud's white paper on storage and disaster recovery. I do not make any promises to when any of it might be implemented and/or if i

Re: some interesting observations on the relative performance of kvm vs. bhyve

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Peter Grehan wrote: > > I have 1 host that dual boots FreeBSD and Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS and bhtyve > >> seems to be atleast 3 or 4 times faster with disk I/O then kvm using the >> most stripped down command lines I can come up with. >> > > I'm guessing that the defa

Re: some interesting observations on the relative performance of kvm vs. bhyve

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Peter Grehan wrote: > > I have 1 host that dual boots FreeBSD and Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS and bhtyve > >> seems to be atleast 3 or 4 times faster with disk I/O then kvm using the >> most stripped down command lines I can come up with. >> > > I'm guessing that the defa

some interesting observations on the relative performance of kvm vs. bhyve

I have 1 host that dual boots FreeBSD and Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS and bhtyve seems to be atleast 3 or 4 times faster with disk I/O then kvm using the most stripped down command lines I can come up with. -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org __

who should I report this to?

Under kvm (ubuntu 12.04.03 LTS) when logged in via VNC and installing 10-RELEASE the installer just boots you during the disk initialization phase. Who should this be reported to? -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ fr

Re: Bhyve and network virtualization

Just an example of this then I will be quiet and take my frustration out on inanimate objects which what kind of hair brained unix like OS would not come with a working C compiler (ubuntu does not come with one) On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > I forgot how frustrat

Re: Bhyve and network virtualization

s, i saw this two days ago. I read it and take many notes. > > > 2014-02-01 Aryeh Friedman : > > Just a small tip if your new to FreeBSD you might surprised that 90% of >> the real action happens in mailling lists not web based things. Namely >> -virtualization@ is li

Re: Bhyve and network virtualization

d the new iSCSI seem to be great too. The ZFS > integration in FB is just perfect ! > One thing miss me in Solaris and OmniOS, the virtual network stack, > Crossbow. But i'm sure after few days of studies, i'll be the most happy of > sysadmin of the world :-D > > fax >

Re: Bhyve and network virtualization

I very like bhyve and the new iSCSI seem to be great too. > The fact that bhyve does not attempt to manage the iSCSI directly is a real win here IMO for example see http://docs.openstack.org/admin-guide-cloud/content/ch_introduction-to-openstack-compute.html#section_nova-disaster-recovery-processf

Re: Bhyve and network virtualization

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Frédéric Alix wrote: > Few minutes ago i read this: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2013-10-2013-12.html#FreeBSD-Host-Support-for-OpenStack-and-OpenContrail > > Hum... OpenContrail port .. :p > I am not interesting by OpenStack but OpenContrail, of c

Re: ports/185362: [NEW PORT] emulators/petitecloud (resubmittal after many flaws fixed)

Looks like the formating got messed up you can always find the latest patch at http://www.petitecloud.org/downloads/patch.tar.gz On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/185362; it has been noted by > GNATS. > > From: Aryeh Fr

Re: ports/185362: [NEW PORT] emulators/petitecloud (resubmittal after many flaws fixed)

Attached is the final working copy of the patch (there have been about 30 downloads without any complaints) please commit it -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org *** /dev/null Wed Jan 29 21:34:50 2014 --- scrap/port/pkg-descrWed Jan 29 19:40:40 2014 *

petitecloud.org acknowledgements page

See http://www.petitecloud.org/acknowledge.jsp for public acknowledgement of all the help the community has given so far. -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org ___ freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.f

Re: CFT: Procedure for installing DevStack on FreeBSD using PetiteCloud

Forgot to mention that we would of course like to join forces. Our main goals are increasing the stability of open stack (outside of the data center) installs by using virtualization to give fallover even for the smallest of clouds and such. Namely we think that a typical non-data center OpenSta

Re: CFT: Procedure for installing DevStack on FreeBSD using PetiteCloud

ll up, it should be available soon. If you are > also interested in bringing the OpenStack into the FreeBSD world, perhaps > it would make a sense to join forces and make it happen sooner. > > Regards, > Michal. > > > On 31 January 2014 10:28, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > >>

Re: CFT: Procedure for installing DevStack on FreeBSD using PetiteCloud

> I agree as you are really installing devstack on ubuntu within petiteCloud. > Also sending reply again as I forgot to reply all. > All good tutorials are basically how to take existing tools and combine them into something new. Also as far I know *NO ONE* [at least publically] has ever gotten

Re: CFT: Procedure for installing DevStack on FreeBSD using PetiteCloud

k that has almost all of corporate america behind them On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Kevin Bowling wrote: > On 1/31/2014 1:20 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > >> Can people look at the instructions/tutorial on how to install DevStack on >> FreeBSD at http://www.freebsd-open

CFT: Procedure for installing DevStack on FreeBSD using PetiteCloud

Can people look at the instructions/tutorial on how to install DevStack on FreeBSD at http://www.freebsd-openstack.org and let us know if anything is confusing, misleading or just outright wrong in it? (Note the domain is brand new so there might be some DNS jitter) -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead De

  1   2   3   >