adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5318
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0s
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5317
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0s
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5316
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0s
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5290
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0s
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5275
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0s
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5276
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0s
adrian accepted this revision.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5274
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
howard0su_gmail.com, honzhan_microsoft.com, adrian, network
Cc: free
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5273
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0s
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5272
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0s
adrian accepted this revision.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5185
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0su_gmail.com, np, transport, hselasky,
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5283
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0s
adrian accepted this revision.
This revision has a positive review.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5282
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_microsoft.com, howard0s
adrian accepted this revision.
adrian added a comment.
Nice! Thanks for all this work!
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5185
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microsoft.com,
honzhan_
adrian added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
sys/dev/hyperv/netvsc/hv_netvsc_drv_freebsd.c:455 this should be a separate
commit
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5185
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, netwo
adrian accepted this revision.
adrian added a comment.
This revision has a positive review.
Fine by me!
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5175
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://reviews.freebsd.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: sepherosa_gmail.com, delphij, royger, decui_microso
Something that just popped up here in local hacking is ensuring that
all the vnet state is correctly torn down _after_ the system has
finished with things that reference it.
For example, having the vnet state torn out from underneath say,
active TCP timers that haven't yet been cleaned up.
Is tha
... is it enabled by default on pcbsd?
-a
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Cool! Glad to have helped!
-a
On 29 November 2013 00:47, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> Modify that function to print out keg->uk_name as well.
>
>
>
> Done. See:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/
Modify that function to print out keg->uk_name as well.
-a
On 27 November 2013 12:45, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> Well, the first step is figuring out which UMA zones are actually
>> problema
Well, the first step is figuring out which UMA zones are actually
problematic. Isn't it logging which zones aren't empty?
-a
On 26 November 2013 20:01, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> As part of looking at this bug in FreeNAS:
>
> "Panic on new jail with vnet"
> https://bugs.freenas.org/i
I'm happy keeping it virtual (it lets us do things like set per-vimage
mbuf tag limits, and having per-vimage mbufs may be a useful long term
stretch goal to have).. we just have to think about this stuff in more
detail.
-adrian
___
freebsd-virtualizat
, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't think the default vnet context is the correct behaviour there.
>> We'd need to figure out what the vnet context of the mbuf is and set
>> that.
>>
>
> What do you think about Marko&#
On 22 July 2013 08:43, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this comes from the eventhandlers pf installs to handle
> ifnet events. It seems like a wifi event causes this code to run
> and the context is not set. Does the panic happen only when you
> use vnet jails?
>
> Could you try putting
hm. There's lots of mbuf free calls in the net80211 TX and RX path; do
we have to have to set the vnet context during the whole tx/rx path?
-adrian
On 21 July 2013 23:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I used a kernel config with the following lines:
>
> include GENERIC
> options VIMAGE
>
>
Hi!
It looks fine to me.
Thanks,
-adrian
On 7 July 2013 02:30, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried running PC-BSD 9.1 on an HP Elitebook 8460p laptop (
> http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/pscmi...oks/8460p.html ).
> See the screenshot I posted here:
>
> http://forums.pcbsd.org/showthread.ph
... you mean if mpt and em share an interrupt, things get wedged?
adrian
On 18 June 2013 01:16, C. L. Martinez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First, sorry for the cross-posting.
>
> I have installed a FreeBSD 8.4 vm under an ESXi 5.1 U1 server. All
> works ok, except for interrupt usage between mpt a
I -know- i have booted a compiled kernel with VIMAGE, but the module failed ..
Adrian
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-virtua
${KERNBUILDDIR}/opt_global.h
> .else
> CFLAGS+= -include opt_global.h
> MKDEP= -include opt_global.h
>
> opt_global.h:
> echo "#define VIMAGE 1" > ${.TARGET}
> .endif
>
> ?
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
&
On 6 March 2012 13:51, Marko Zec wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 March 2012 22:49:56 Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Wait a sec. Is it possible that the macro is a no-op when we're
>> building modules w/ VNET?
>
> Yes that's it, the VNET stuff resolves (mostly) to whitespace when
Wait a sec. Is it possible that the macro is a no-op when we're
building modules w/ VNET?
Adrian
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"fre
On 6 March 2012 12:13, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
> I am confused so whats the difference between having wlan in kernel
> config or not? Cuase that seems the reason why we panic... linker
> problems?
Yeah. That _is_ a bit weird.
adrian
___
freebsd-vi
Hi,
The trouble here is that net80211 has quite a few other contexts that
things are called from:
* driver taskqueue;
* net80211 taskqueue;
* driver callouts;
* net80211 callouts;
* ioctls via net80211.
That's in parallel with frame tx/rx and device ioctls.
I don't personally have the time to g
Hi,
What do we need to do to get VNET working in net80211 and the network drivers?
Adrian
On 6 March 2012 07:33, Marko Zec wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 March 2012 10:53:18 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Marko Zec wrote:
>> > On Monday 05 March 2012 22:14:45 Monthadar
33 matches
Mail list logo
