On 3/29/19 9:29 PM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
That, iirc, would be the SMBIOS version of ed2k, which yes should
be updated if infact the newer ed2k has a new SBIOS implementation,
if it is still 1.00 implementaton then this needs to be left
alone.
Under OVMF "smbiosview -t 0" shows:
Vendor:
> On 3/25/19 3:59 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
> >
> > Yep, makes sense to me. For either of these changes we would want to get
> > test converage on basically all functionality, so might as well take
> > both changes at once.
>
>
> One thing I noticed is that the SMBIOS information claims it's BH
On 3/29/19 12:29 PM, Rebecca Cran via freebsd-virtualization wrote:
On 3/25/19 3:59 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
Yep, makes sense to me. For either of these changes we would want to get
test converage on basically all functionality, so might as well take
both changes at once.
One thing I noti
On 3/25/19 3:59 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
Yep, makes sense to me. For either of these changes we would want to get
test converage on basically all functionality, so might as well take
both changes at once.
One thing I noticed is that the SMBIOS information claims it's BHYVE
BIOS v1.00 rele
