[Bug 213618] When running as a Hyper-V Guest, FreeBSD 11 networking does not work

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213618 --- Comment #6 from Sepherosa Ziehau --- (In reply to Renato Botelho from comment #5) It's this commit: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=306433 The redmine can't be accessed. I believe this bug only affects WS2008R2

Re: Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

Hi! I made a little diagram of the situation that I posted of Twitter. If you are aggressive enough with the web interface you can see a full size version where the labels are clear enough to read. https://twitter.com/MUP4/status/814595352112283649 I had fun doing it. Hope it provides a little

[Bug 213618] When running as a Hyper-V Guest, FreeBSD 11 networking does not work

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213618 Renato Botelho changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ga...@freebsd.org --- Comment #5

Re: Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

As mentioned a bridge is the virtual equivalent of a switch. It only really makes sense to have more than one bridge if you have more than one interface on your guest(s), and want to connect those interfaces to separate networks. (Or you want some guests on a different network, possibly bridged to

Re: Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Vincent Olivier wrote: > Hi! > > > Use the same bridge but a different tap (each tap represents the virtual > equivalent of a NIC where the bridge is the virtual equivalent of a hub) > > > Thanks! This is very clear. For extra isolation, could I use a new bridge

Re: Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

Hi! > Use the same bridge but a different tap (each tap represents the virtual > equivalent of a NIC where the bridge is the virtual equivalent of a hub) Thanks! This is very clear. For extra isolation, could I use a new bridge too or is that useless? Thanks! Vincent ___

Re: Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Vincent Olivier wrote: > Hi, > > I have my first arch linux virtual machine running fine on FreeBSD 11. Now > I want to make another one. Should I create a new bridge? A new tap too? It > is not clear from the documentation if these steps are required for > multip

Re: Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 09:50:47AM -0500, Vincent Olivier wrote: > Should I create a new bridge? It depends. If you share a bridge over multiple VMs, each VM can see the traffic of all other VMs. > A new tap too? I think you need this, yes. -- Christian ___

Multiple bhyve Guests, Single bridge/tap?

Hi, I have my first arch linux virtual machine running fine on FreeBSD 11. Now I want to make another one. Should I create a new bridge? A new tap too? It is not clear from the documentation if these steps are required for multiple guests on a single host… Thanks! Happy Holidays, Vincent si

Re: ASM1062 AHCI timeouts, ppt(4) BAR aligning [Was: Re: svn commit: r309251 - head/sys/dev/ahci]

Bezüglich Alexander Motin's Nachricht vom 29.12.2016 11:32 (localtime): > On 29.12.2016 10:35, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: >> I'd like to report that this doesn't fix timeouts for me (applied to >> 11-stable). >> >> For example my REV120 works without problems on Intel-AHCI but not on >> ASM1062-AHCI

ASM1062 AHCI timeouts, ppt(4) BAR aligning [Was: Re: svn commit: r309251 - head/sys/dev/ahci]

Bezüglich Alexander Motin's Nachricht vom 28.11.2016 17:23 (localtime): > Author: mav > Date: Mon Nov 28 16:23:32 2016 > New Revision: 309251 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/309251 > > Log: > Process port interrupt even is PxIS register is zero. > > ASMedia ASM1062 AHCI chi