Re: Windows/bhyve Bluescreen 0x50

2015-12-20 Thread Peter Grehan
Hi Trent, Revisiting this old topic: I started playing with Peter's Windows guide and have run into a Blue Screen of Death already. I am using Windows 2016, and only changed the passwords in the AutoUnattend. The zvol is 64GB in size. I also tried it with a 40GB empty file for a disk, just to

Re: bhyve PCI pass-through to Linux guest

2015-12-20 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Sergey Manucharian's message from Sat 19-Dec-15 22:36: > Excerpts from Peter Grehan's message from Sun 20-Dec-15 15:18: > > >>> # bhyve -S ... -s 7,passthru,0/20/0 ... > > > > That's the bhyve command line (if that's the one you meant). You also > > have to pass '-S' when invoking

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Adam Vande More
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > > Remote console is available via VNC, not RDP. > > It is VNC, and I use it Linux hosts, it's rather confusing since the option > is "--vrde on|off". See https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2013-January/010354.html

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Adam Vande More's message from Sun 20-Dec-15 09:36: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > > > I agree that VirtualBox is really stable, and I'm using it in production > > environments for many years. However, there are a couple of possible > > drawbacks: It

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Udo Rader
On 12/20/2015 09:15 AM, Peter Ross wrote: > Hi all, > > I read through an older threat I kept in my archive. It started like this: > > On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Udo Rader wrote: > >> As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four >> hypervisors: >> >> * bhyve >> * KVM >> * QEMU >> * Vir

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Adam Vande More
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > I agree that VirtualBox is really stable, and I'm using it in production > environments for many years. However, there are a couple of possible > drawbacks: It does not support VRDP (remote console) and USB2/3 on FreeBSD. > > Tha latter

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Miroslav Lachman's message from Sun 20-Dec-15 09:57: > Peter Ross wrote on 12/20/2015 09:15: > >> As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four > >> hypervisors: > >> > >> * bhyve > >> * KVM > >> * QEMU > >> * VirtualBox > > > > .. and later Xen was mentioned. > >

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Adam Vande More
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Peter Ross wrote: > Hi all, > > I read through an older threat I kept in my archive. It started like this: > > On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Udo Rader wrote: > > As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors: >> >> * bhyve >> * KVM >> * QEMU >> *

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Peter Ross wrote on 12/20/2015 09:15: Hi all, I read through an older threat I kept in my archive. It started like this: On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Udo Rader wrote: As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors: * bhyve * KVM * QEMU * VirtualBox .. and later Xen was me

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Peter Ross
Hi all, I read through an older threat I kept in my archive. It started like this: On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Udo Rader wrote: As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors: * bhyve * KVM * QEMU * VirtualBox .. and later Xen was mentioned. I ask myself which of the sol