kristof added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
sys/netpfil/pf/pf_ioctl.c:325 It's not clear to me why this is done here,
rather than in pf_unload(). The initialisation is done in pf_load() after all.
sys/netpfil/pf/pf_ioctl.c:3725 Don't we still need to do all of this
somewhere?
REVISION DE
rodrigc added a reviewer: kristof.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1944
To: nvass-gmx.com, gnn, bz, zec, trociny, glebius, rodrigc, kristof
Cc: freebsd-virtualization, freebsd-pf, freebsd-net
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing
Hi Julian,
Thank you for your explanation and tips, Peter. I just tried changing
virtio-blk -> ahci-hd and preliminary results are good. And now you've
mentioned it, I do recall seeing slightly less performance degradation
on guests with 2 vCPUs vs. ones with just one.
Glad to hear that :)
On 2015-03-25 15:44:35 +, Peter Grehan said:
In 10.1, virtio-blk i/o is done sychronously in the context of the
guest vCPU exit. If it's a single vCPU guest, or the virtio-net
interrupt happens to be delivered to that vCPU, performance will suffer.
A workaround is to use ahci-hd for the dis
