On Monday 22 July 2013 21:01:31 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Well I'm worried about _other_ stuff causing issues here.
>
> So - what's the "right" behaviour? Does vnet/vimage make the
> assumption that for all the mbuf processing/free operations, the vnet
> tag/state is set?
To the best of my knowledge,
Is there a FreeBSD ami image for downloads on a local lab openstack test
environment ??
___
freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-virtual
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> I don't think the default vnet context is the correct behaviour there.
> We'd need to figure out what the vnet context of the mbuf is and set
> that.
>
>
What do you think about Marko's suggestion to de-virtualize
V_pf_mtag_z? What would
Well I'm worried about _other_ stuff causing issues here.
So - what's the "right" behaviour? Does vnet/vimage make the
assumption that for all the mbuf processing/free operations, the vnet
tag/state is set?
-adrian
On 22 July 2013 11:59, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:11 A
On 22 July 2013 08:43, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this comes from the eventhandlers pf installs to handle
> ifnet events. It seems like a wifi event causes this code to run
> and the context is not set. Does the panic happen only when you
> use vnet jails?
>
> Could you try putting
On 07/22/13 09:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I used a kernel config with the following lines:
include GENERIC
options VIMAGE
and compiled a CURRENT kernel from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head@253346 .
I also have PF enabled on my system.
Once in a while I have been getting kernel panics lik
Hi,
On 22 Jul 2013, at 10:40, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
>> Could you also try a HEAD XENHVM kernel (without my patches), to see if
>> the issue is related to my changes or to some bug already present in HEAD?
It seems I was worrying too soon.
I have been putting the system through the wringer s
On Monday 22 July 2013 08:57:43 Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > hm. There's lots of mbuf free calls in the net80211 TX and RX path; do
> > we have to have to set the vnet context during the whole tx/rx path?
>
> I'm not sure about that.
> In src/s
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
On 22/07/13 10:40, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22 Jul 2013, at 10:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> Is your guest running a 32bit or a 64bit kernel?
>
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD positron.dckd.nl 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
> r+a09eac7-dirty: Wed Jul 17 17:51:10 CEST 2013
> root
Hi,
On 22 Jul 2013, at 10:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> Is your guest running a 32bit or a 64bit kernel?
$ uname -a
FreeBSD positron.dckd.nl 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r+a09eac7-dirty:
Wed Jul 17 17:51:10 CEST 2013
root@image01:/usr/obj/usr/home/jeroen/freebsd/sys/XENHVM amd64
>
On 22/07/13 09:18, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After some more testing I thought it would be good to put this into
> production for my personal server. I've used pvhvm_v19 and built it without
> debugging options and installed it on a FreeBSD 9.1 system.
>
> I've run into some hiccups w
Hi,
After some more testing I thought it would be good to put this into production
for my personal server. I've used pvhvm_v19 and built it without debugging
options and installed it on a FreeBSD 9.1 system.
I've run into some hiccups with 9.1 user land and a 10-CURRENT kernel, but
that's all
13 matches
Mail list logo
