Re: VIMAGE + PF crash in mbuf destructor

2013-07-21 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hm. There's lots of mbuf free calls in the net80211 TX and RX path; do > we have to have to set the vnet context during the whole tx/rx path? > I'm not sure about that. In src/sys/netpfil/pf/pf.c, we have this in pf_initialize(): 751

Re: VIMAGE + PF crash in mbuf destructor

2013-07-21 Thread Adrian Chadd
hm. There's lots of mbuf free calls in the net80211 TX and RX path; do we have to have to set the vnet context during the whole tx/rx path? -adrian On 21 July 2013 23:32, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > Hi, > > I used a kernel config with the following lines: > > include GENERIC > options VIMAGE > >

VIMAGE + PF crash in mbuf destructor

2013-07-21 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, I used a kernel config with the following lines: include GENERIC options VIMAGE and compiled a CURRENT kernel from svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head@253346 . I also have PF enabled on my system. Once in a while I have been getting kernel panics like these: =